To: tmp02
Paper is not an anchor, which is what that footnote meant. If you're going to make a profound, gotcha statement, make sure you don't get it exactly backwards.
107 posted on
11/28/2006 10:08:59 AM PST by
Toddsterpatriot
(If you agree with EPI, you're not a conservative!)
To: Toddsterpatriot
That is what it said. Yes if Gold is there, everything is in good shape and then Canada has no need for another currency. No Gold anchor, Canada needs another currency. Do you understand? Simple right....
111 posted on
11/28/2006 10:14:17 AM PST by
tmp02
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson