[tmp02]

That is what it said. Yes if Gold is there, everything is in good shape and then Canada has no need for another currency. No Gold anchor, Canada needs another currency. Do you understand? Simple right....

[Toddsterpatriot]

That is what it said.

It said a commodity is an anchor. Convertibility to a commodity. Unless the "Amero" is convertible, there is no anchor, so your statement is ignorant.

No Gold anchor, Canada needs another currency.

Wow, one no anchor currency traded for another no anchor currency. Good idea.

Do you understand?

That you don't know what you're talking about? Yes, I understand.

[ASOC]

Not to butt in

But

I see this thread got all the way to 100 and a bit before someone said

gold.

I stand amazed, usually when a piece is posted about changes to US currency, gold is in the first 5 to 7 replies.

Me? I am holding out for the chocolate dollar - commodities based currency, like in the *real old* days.