To: laotzu
The sources of that conflict, having never been adequately resolved, continue to this day. It is, in fact, precisely what brings many to this forum.How does that fit into "Shame of the Yankees"? It's clearly an attempt to connect people of today to 140 years ago. It's fatuous and divisive.
48 posted on
11/21/2006 8:31:23 AM PST by
raybbr
(You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote.)
To: raybbr
"It's clearly an attempt to connect people of today to 140 years ago. It's fatuous and divisive."Odd, it used to be called "history".
I seem to remember a quote about what happens to those who ignore "history"...must look that up.
50 posted on
11/21/2006 8:37:39 AM PST by
norton
To: raybbr
How does that fit into "Shame of the Yankees"? Forgive my ignorance, but what is "Shame of the Yankees"?
54 posted on
11/21/2006 8:42:19 AM PST by
laotzu
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson