[Poser]

Hmm... Short, blonde and somewhat less than manly...

Sorry. Not Bond.

[BenLurkin]

Short, blonde and somewhat less than manly...

Sounds like Vladimir Putin.

[Cecily]

Not manly?

[Jmouse007]

Like I said, before you prejudge give the guy a chance and see the film for yourself.

As for short, Humphry Bogart was short and he was one of the biggest tough guys in film history as was James Cagney. Besides in film EVERY leading man looks 6 feet tall.

[my_pointy_head_is_sharp]

Here's the rottentomatoes link to Casino Royale. One reviewer calls it "pure testosterone pleasure." So he may not be the unmanly Bond you think.

[the scotsman]

Poser,I can tell you for a fact that Daniel Craig is around 5'11 or 6ft as I have a friend who was a runner on Layercake and he is at 5'10 slightly shorter.

[brwnsuga]

Short, blonde and somewhat less than manly...


I'm going to see the movie tomorrow. Can't wait. I have seen Craig in "the Mother', 'Layer Cake', 'Enduring Love' and 'Road to Perdition" I find him very manly. I am not usually attracted to blonde men but if I weren't already married, I'd let him take me out for a cup of coffee.....

[laconic]

Daniel Craig is not short (he's 5'11") and he's much more "manly" than muscle-less, totally unconvincing Pierce Brosnan will ever be (the only man who "fights" and his hair stays perfectly combed). An excellent performance by Daniel Craig in Casino Royale, much closer to the Sean Connery/Tim Dalton type envisioned by Ian Fleming in the books; nothing like the clown Roger Moore or the debonair (and not much else) Brosnan.