Posted on 11/07/2006 9:52:15 PM PST by quesney
Edited on 11/07/2006 9:59:09 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
Does the big Democrat win of the House mean Democrats will be able and willing to pull the plug on funding for our war in Iraq, force our withdrawal, encourage the Kurds to declare outright independence, send the whole country into the toilet (err...deeper into the toilet) and greatly embolden Islamofascists everywhere?
Bush has already been fighting this War on Terror with at least one arm tied behind his back. Is the War on Terror effectively over now?...err, until the next terrorist attack? Thoughts?
I think the democrats might have to move carefully with their plans for the WOT. They can't immediatly move to pull all funding for the War in Iraq because then they'll be showing the American people that the Republicans were right about them.
If we get that the Democrats will be drummed out of office so fast that heads will swim, as the old saying goes. Carter's indecisiveness cost him the election even among the huge majority of Democrats.
Hell hath no fury like a President who doesn't have to face the voters.
The Dems won't overplay their hand for awhile, but trust me, they will eventually. It's the IRANIANS I'm counting on. They will overreach: this election guarantees it.
War will come to Israel first, from three sides. You will be surprised at our response, I suspect.
Be Seeing You,
Chris
The Bush Doctrine died a long time ago, IMO. We let Iran and Syria kill us in Iraq. We let Iran harbor Al Qaeda.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.