Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Airbus A380 a bit too superjumboPassenger plane is 5.5 tons overweight, customer reports
Seattle Post-Intelligencer ^ | 10/28/2006 | James Wallace

Posted on 10/30/2006 2:45:50 PM PST by Paul Ross

Airbus A380 a bit too superjumbo Passenger plane is 5.5 tons overweight, customer reports

By JAMES WALLACE
P-I AEROSPACE REPORTER, Seattle Post-Intelligencer, October 28, 2006

The Boeing Co.'s 787 Dreamliner is not the only jetliner in development that needs to go on a diet.

The double-decker A380, the 555-passenger giant from Airbus that has been delayed for up to two years by what Airbus has said are wiring problems, is about 5.5 tons overweight, a senior executive with an airline that has ordered the plane disclosed Friday.

Airbus has not previously acknowledged that its flagship new jet is significantly heavier than customers were promised.

Tim Clark, president of Emirates Airlines, which has ordered 43 of the superjumbos, revealed the weight problems while speaking Friday to reporters at Heathrow Airport in London.

"We have not yet engaged with Airbus as regards not only the delay but the fact that it is overweight," Clark told reporters, according to a Reuters report. He was in London for the opening of a new lounge at Heathrow Airport that will be used by A380 passengers.

Airbus has blamed a series of delays in getting the A380 ready for customers on wiring issues. But some industry analysts have speculated that wiring alone could not fully explain why the plane is two years behind schedule.

Richard Aboulafia, vice president of analysis for the Teal Group, an industry consulting business in Fairfax, Va., said it is now clear there are additional problems.

"This is big news," he said of the revelation by Clark that the A380 is 5.5 tons too heavy.

That's the equivalent of about 55 passengers who weigh 200 pounds each, Aboulafia noted.

"This goes a long way in explaining the delay," Aboulafia said. "Wiring alone did not explain what we were all hearing. It sounds like weight-reduction design changes are a big part of the delay, too."

The first A380 was supposed to have been delivered to Singapore Airlines early this year. The airline won't get the first plane until next October, Airbus has said.

Emirates will be the second airline to get A380s. But that won't happen until 2008. Under the original Airbus delivery schedule, Emirates would have had 18 A380s by the time it will now get its first plane, Clark said.

The airline is sending its own audit team to Toulouse, France, home of Airbus, to investigate the delays and determine how realistic the latest A380 delivery schedule is, Clark told reporters. The A380 problems led to a major management shake-up at Airbus this summer. The top executive resigned. His replacement recently resigned, too.

Weight is a problem with all new aircraft development programs. A heavier plane burns more fuel. Range and payload are affected.

Earlier this week, Boeing said its 787 Dreamliner is 2 percent to 3 percent over the target weight, and a team is working on the problem. Boeing would not say how many pounds that percentage represents.

"We considered whether we should give out a figure, but it literally changes by the week and sometimes by the day," a Boeing spokeswoman said Friday.

Final assembly of the Dreamliner won't start for several months. That makes it easier for engineers to look for ways to get the weight out. But the A380 is already in flight testing.

Typically, launch customers for an all-new jet from Boeing or Airbus get performance guarantees written in their contracts, with financial penalties if the plane is too heavy and does not perform as promised.

Clark would not comment on any financial compensation that Emirates might seek from Airbus because of the A380 delays and the weight problem.

And he did not sound convinced that there won't be more delays.

"It would be foolish to say we do not expect anything further," he was quoted as saying when asked if there could be a fourth A380 delay announcement from Airbus.

Clark also was asked about the A350XWB, the plane that Airbus has said it will develop to challenge Boeing's 787 as well as the bigger 777.

In July, Airbus announced that it would redesign the A350 in response to customers' criticism that the previous design was not good enough to challenge the 787.

Clark said the latest version of the A350XWB (extra wide body) is still lacking. Emirates has been considering a 100-plane order for either the 787 or A350.

Meanwhile, Airbus does not have a plane to seriously challenge either the 787 or the bigger 777.

This was underscored again Friday when Emirates announced that it has canceled a $4.2 billion order for 10 of the Airbus A340-600 models and dropped options for eight more.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: a380; airbus; debacle; overweight

1 posted on 10/30/2006 2:45:52 PM PST by Paul Ross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
Already posted here.
2 posted on 10/30/2006 2:47:05 PM PST by Yossarian (Everyday, somewhere on the globe, somebody is pushing the frontier of stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross

Just take out 55 seats. I'm fine with that.


3 posted on 10/30/2006 2:47:05 PM PST by sionnsar (†trad-anglican.faithweb.com†|Iran Azadi| 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY) | UN: Useless Nations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar

Or they could simply tell Michael Moore that he's not allowed on board.


4 posted on 10/30/2006 2:48:01 PM PST by Redcloak (Speak softly and wear a loud shirt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
Airbus A380: The BIG Pig
5 posted on 10/30/2006 2:48:04 PM PST by sionnsar (†trad-anglican.faithweb.com†|Iran Azadi| 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY) | UN: Useless Nations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yossarian

Missed it.


6 posted on 10/30/2006 2:50:04 PM PST by Paul Ross (We cannot be for lawful ordinances and for an alien conspiracy at one and the same moment.-Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross

Must be Bushes fault.


7 posted on 10/30/2006 2:51:18 PM PST by Dallas59 (Muslims Are Only Guests In Western Countries)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross

Get rid of the tail section, Oh Wait....


8 posted on 10/30/2006 2:51:58 PM PST by cmsgop ( Try Miracle Grow, with New and Improved Uterus Growing Power, endorsed by Cindy Sheehan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yossarian

BTW, having a surplus thread...its almost worth it not to have to see another picture of the Ted Kennedy Blimp....


9 posted on 10/30/2006 2:53:06 PM PST by Paul Ross (We cannot be for lawful ordinances and for an alien conspiracy at one and the same moment.-Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar

Just put less fuel in the bird and ban German passengers or obese passengers and give discounts to anorexic passengers. If you multiply 550 x 150, they are most of the way there. Make those statutory passengers go on a diet. Don't serve soda or junk food either and only give high protein meals to those few passengers who are actually paying a high enough premium to get fed and I think you have a solution.


10 posted on 10/30/2006 2:53:19 PM PST by appeal2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59

LOL!


11 posted on 10/30/2006 2:56:43 PM PST by Paul Ross (We cannot be for lawful ordinances and for an alien conspiracy at one and the same moment.-Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: appeal2

Well.......how bout no meals, no drinks, no water, no potty paper or potty rooms, everybody leaves their shoes behind and and only a total combined luggage of ten pounds. That outta get her down to flying weight!!!
Oh, and all coin, cash and jewelry can be left in my box at the head of the boarding ramp. There, that'll do it.


12 posted on 10/30/2006 3:03:17 PM PST by biff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross

Captain just needs to leave his wallet.


13 posted on 10/30/2006 3:15:33 PM PST by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross

Who in their right mind would want to fly with 554 people??? There are soooooo many crazies in the world.


14 posted on 10/30/2006 3:22:42 PM PST by Suzy Quzy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross

Just remove the "Air" and call it a bus. (Better remove the
wings too.)


15 posted on 10/30/2006 3:42:57 PM PST by beethovenfan (If Islam is the solution, the "problem" must be freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
The NEW AirBus!
16 posted on 10/30/2006 4:20:03 PM PST by Moose Dung (Perquacky is a fools game.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
A couple of observations.

1) Almost all aircraft end up being overweight, either on first flight, or sometime during the design phase. Some just stay that way and they live with it. (Usually a combination of living with it, and some reduction in weight)

2)While 5 tons sounds like a lot, they don't say what the target for max takeoff weight, or for that matter max dry weight, is. If it's 1000 tons, well, 5 tons isn't' much, If it's 100 tons, it's much more significant.

According to the Airbus site ( http://www.airbus.com/en/aircraftfamilies/a380/a380/specifications.html ) the dry weight of an A380 is specified as 361 tonnes, with a max T/O weight of 560 tonnes and max ramp weight of 562 tonnes. Typical payload is listed as 66.4 tonnes. So 5 tonnes would represent a significant, but not crippling, loss of payload, but not so much a loss of fuel/range (note they allow for burning off 2 tonnes, between ramp and takeoff).


All that said, I hope Boeing rips their knickers, as I expect to happen.
17 posted on 10/30/2006 4:29:23 PM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar

Howard Hughes' big plane was known as the Spruce Goose. Looks like the A-380 will be known as the Aluminum Albatross.


18 posted on 10/30/2006 4:34:01 PM PST by NCC-1701 (To boldy go where no FReeper has gone before. Live long and prosper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson