1 posted on
10/30/2006 1:15:23 PM PST by
presidio9
To: presidio9
2 posted on
10/30/2006 1:16:50 PM PST by
AuH2ORepublican
(http://auh2orepublican.blogspot.com/)
To: presidio9
Oh great, now we have invisible porn. I think about sex too much as it is!
4 posted on
10/30/2006 1:18:14 PM PST by
lovecraft
(Specialization is for insects.)
To: presidio9
"There's little chance the techniques used in the team's experiment will find their way into advertising any time soon"
Yeah, Disney's already done it, why be a copycat.
5 posted on
10/30/2006 1:18:27 PM PST by
stm
(Katherine Harris for US Senate!)
To: presidio9
I hope they aren't using my tax dollars for funding this crap, too.....
To: presidio9
THIS THREAD IS USELESS WITH PICTURES
To: presidio9
"a small "probe" pattern "
13 posted on
10/30/2006 1:25:48 PM PST by
Hatteras
To: presidio9
So you can make an image invisible to one eye by placing a noise pattern in front of the other eye? Sez who?
To: Xenalyte
16 posted on
10/30/2006 1:32:53 PM PST by
presidio9
(Make Mohammed's day: Shoot a nun in the back.)
To: presidio9
I'd post an even more graphic example, but I don't want to be banned....
17 posted on
10/30/2006 1:46:20 PM PST by
GoldCountryRedneck
(Think of Pelosi as Speaker, then hold your nose and vote Republican....)
To: presidio9
"You'd need to present two different images to the two eyes, and that's not easily achieved in everyday situations," he said.
21 posted on
10/30/2006 2:36:39 PM PST by
frithguild
(The Freepers moved as a group, like a school of sharks sweeping toward an unaware and unarmed victim)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson