Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Dane
Uh d!ckhead, Kelo was done by SCOTUS.

Uh, teenager. POTUS's position was behind the SCOTUS position.

Knowing his conservative property owner base was wavering, Bush’s political handlers seized an opportunity to make them feel good by issuing a nonsense EO supposed to manipulate the masses into believing he disavows Kelo and supports private property.

Nothing could be further from the truth. Like so many states now addressing the Supreme Court decision through legislation, Mr. Bush appears to be condemning eminent domain, but in reality, he’s condoning its use by incorporating many of the current abuses and then expanding the governmental fiat.

Section 3 of the EO sets out specific exclusions or purposes under which private property can be taken by the federal government. They include “Public ownership or exclusive use of the property by the public, such as for a public…roadway, park, forest, governmental office building, or military reservation; (b) projects designated for public, common carrier, public transportation, or public utility use, including those for which a fee is assessed; (c) conveying the property to a non-governmental entity; (d) preventing or mitigating a harmful use of land that constitutes a threat to public health, safety, or the environment.”

Guest Column: How proud Jefferson must be of George W. Bush

38 posted on 10/19/2006 2:33:50 PM PDT by raybbr (You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: raybbr
Well duh???

The executive branch was following the judcial branch, and the only way you can change the judical branch is to elect a sympathetic executive and legislative branch, and IMO, you are sympahtetic to the executive and legislative branches of hillary and nancy pelosi.

BTW, it was still SCOTUS that mandated Kelo, no matter your caterwalling.

39 posted on 10/19/2006 2:38:28 PM PDT by Dane ("Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" Ronald Reagan, 1987)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: raybbr
It's instructive to compare the text of the Executive Order with the portion your article chooses to quote. I thought omitting passages without including ellipsis points or some other indication is a no-no.
41 posted on 10/19/2006 2:45:28 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson