Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: HAL9000
we are upset at Windows for not being more hardy against such viruses

I don't speak Yiddish, but I think it must be the very definition of chutzpah to ship a product with software installed that can damage the customer's computer if he uses a competitor's OS, and then be "upset at" the competitive OS for possibly being unable to defend itself against one's virus-ridden product.

I can understand mistakes, although it's hard to buy that somehow a virus directly affecting your biggest competitor's main product just happened to get onto a product that should never have been connected to anything that could contain a virus before being sold. But whatever PR flack Apple got to write this little non-apology probably needs to be in another line of work.

6 posted on 10/17/2006 2:09:15 PM PDT by Turbopilot (iumop ap!sdn w,I 'aw dlaH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Turbopilot

Apple has had this happen before. A run of the install disks back in the early 1990s or late 1980s were infected by the WDEF virus. Of course, they only affected Macintosh systems, so your theory would appear flawed in the assumption that this was intentional to harm Windows machines.

Far more malicious would be Microsoft patches to the Windows operating system or updates to their Microsoft Media Player software which broke Quicktime, Netscape, or any other third party competing product.


13 posted on 10/17/2006 9:55:25 PM PDT by coconutt2000 (NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Turbopilot
I don't speak Yiddish, but I think it must be the very definition of chutzpah to ship a product with software installed that can damage the customer's computer if he uses a competitor's OS, and then be "upset at" the competitive OS for possibly being unable to defend itself against one's virus-ridden product.

No worse than Microsoft bundling together kludges and scotch tape (following a hasty release of what should have been at best beta software) and calling it a "Service Pack".

Unix forever!

Cheers!

14 posted on 10/17/2006 10:18:54 PM PDT by grey_whiskers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Turbopilot; Swordmaker

I don't think it was so bad. It did acknowledge blame was on their side. They didn't try to stonewall or deny anything, which is the more typical PR response. And I prefer a little snarky humor in my press releases as opposed to the mind-numbingly dull prose that affects most of them.

This should demonstrate the dark side of using contract manufacturers for most of your work. There's very little Apple itself could have done to find or solve this problem :-(.

A virus can't be run without actually being executed on the computer it's being used on. So this seems like a very low-risk problem in reality, because few people try to execute software that's on their iPods. If they loaded a new OS on it, they would have to reformat the volume and the virus would have vanished.

So this should affect Windows users minimally if at all.

D


20 posted on 10/18/2006 8:35:17 AM PDT by daviddennis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson