Replies

"The boys will most likely spend most of their time defending their reaction to being ripped off, supposedly slapped and ridiculed by two of Durham's finest, "just doing their jobs" to support their "fatherless" children in a white male dominated society.."

I was in Vegas a couple of weeks ago. Some of the strippers advertise for 60 dollars to dance. When they get to the event, they get the money up front, and they usually come as a pair. Once they get the money up front, they say, "It's 60 dollars to get us here, but it will cost an additional 500 dollars for us to stay."

Well? Did you pay up or not? (LOL! Just kidding!)

"It's 60 dollars to get us here, but it will cost an additional 500 dollars for us to stay."

We know from Kim's statements and excerpts from the AV's that each has accused the other of wanting to "stay to earn more money but I didn't want to".. Sounds like the first liar didn't have a chance. Then to hear Kim say "she didn't know how to make money on tips" is laughable.

Kim and the AV both admitted they got their $400 up front. Kim even stated the AV claimed to have her money after she was dragged to the car.

So what happened to the AV's $400 that DF gave her and what happened to the additional $1600 that the AV claimed was stolen from her in the original police report.

Methinks poor Kimmie's got some more splainin to do... I wonder if Ed asks her if she robbed the AV? In my opinion it will be a "tell" of how much he knows about the case if he even mentions the 12:53 to 1:20 interval. Even if he does ask, my guess is that Kim ain't saying nothing about the facts of the case. (Remember her "I ain't talkin bout none of that" mumble in her television premier?) She'll just be making more "unsubstantiated" claims similar to the ones Ms. Melanie refuses to publish.

There's no truth in advertising anymore.