So for anyone to get fired up about anything that Kim says, is in my opinion risky.
Who's to say if the police really interrogated her instead of coaching her to fit their version of the crime what she might have told them. It's obvious to me that the cops had some input into her March 22nd, written version of the events...
Kim is in it for Kim, she's changed her story so often, she probably can't even remember the true version...
I agree that getting fired up about what she has to say isn't a good idea in terms of the trial, but in terms of the 60M show, if her account supports the boys, that's a very good thing. If the stories she told about how and where she met up with Mangum that night are explained by her wanting to avoid arrest on her probation violation warrant, it eases the impact of those lies, especially since they aren't germaine to what happened inside the house. People dislike but they understand those kinds of lies. Seldom do witnesses come in packages marked, "Pure as the driven snow."
Again, though, I ask you where and how has she changed her story to the police as to whether or not Mangum was raped or could have been raped, to her knowledge and observations? That testimony you recited is frightening because it indicates to me that she was cooperating with Liefong at that point. Nobody agrees to call themselves a liar unless there's something in it for them. I suspect since then she has gotten counsel and has returned to her original statement. She may even explain her interim opinions given to the media that are slanted toward Liefong with some information about promises and intimidation from and by Liefong. Elmostafa's testimony may buttress that as well.