Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'60 Minutes' interviews Duke lacrosse defendants (DukeLax Ping)
Durham Herald-Sun ^ | October 11, 2006 | John Stevenson

Posted on 10/11/2006 1:52:56 AM PDT by abb

DURHAM -- A CBS "60 Minutes" segment on the controversial Duke University lacrosse rape case is expected to air Sunday evening and will include interviews with all three indicted players and Kim Roberts Pittman, the second dancer at the party where the attack allegedly occurred.

CBS would not comment on the show. The network's normal practice is to withhold information about "60 Minutes" broadcasts until a few days in advance.

But Pittman's lawyer, Mark Simeon of Durham, confirmed Tuesday that his client was interviewed. But Simeon ended a telephone conversation before fielding a question about what Pittman told the interviewer.

An exotic dancer at the time, Pittman was with another dancer who claimed she was raped and sodomized by three lacrosse players during an off-campus party at 610 N. Buchanan Blvd. in mid-March.

Pittman since has been quoted as saying the rape charges were "a crock." She also told police in a March 22 handwritten statement that she and the accuser ended their performance when someone at the lacrosse party "brought out a broomstick and ... said he would use the broomstick on us."

"That statement made me uncomfortable and I felt like I wanted to leave," Pittman added. "I raised my voice to the boys and said the show was over."

Pittman said she then asked the alleged rape victim to leave the party with her. But she said the accuser "felt we could get more money and that we shouldn't leave yet."

According to Pittman, the accuser "began showing signs of intoxication" early in the dance performance and was "basically out of it" by the time it ended.

Pittman finally drove the other dancer to a Hillsborough Road grocery store, from which a 911 call was placed to police.

There is nothing about an alleged rape in Pittman's written statement, which is included in public-record court files.

All three defendants also were interviewed for the "60 Minutes" segment, sources told The Herald-Sun. The interviewer is veteran reporter Ed Bradley.

The three -- Collin Finnerty, Reade Seligmann and David Evans -- remain free under $100,000 bonds as they await a trial that is expected to occur next year. Each maintains he is innocent.

Neither they nor their families could be reached Tuesday for possible comment about the CBS show, and their attorneys had no comment.

Defense lawyers apparently will not appear on the television program. Neither will District Attorney Mike Nifong, who has been widely criticized for allegedly rushing to judgment in the case and making inflammatory public statements before he had sufficient evidence.

For the past four months, Nifong has not discussed the situation publicly. He was out of town on business and unreachable for comment Tuesday.

Benjamin Himan and Mark Gottlieb, police investigators in the lacrosse case, also could not be reached. But sources said the two had not been interviewed by "60 Minutes" as of Friday.

The Police Department repeatedly has declined to discuss the lacrosse incident.

It could not be determined Tuesday if a one-time driver for the alleged rape victim, Jarriel Lanier Johnson, was among those Bradley contacted.

"I have nothing to say about it," Johnson told The Herald-Sun by telephone before hanging up.

But Johnson gave police an April 6 handwritten statement about an "appointment," "a job" and a performance the accuser had at three different hotels in two days not long before the alleged rape.

Johnson also said she had sexual intercourse with him during the same time period.

URL for this article: http://www.heraldsun.com/durham/4-777449.html


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: duke; dukelax; durham; lacrosse; nifong
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 561-580581-600601-620 ... 801-814 next last
To: SarahUSC

There is no time discrepancy. Careful reading of Kim's statement indicates that Kim left the bathroom, Precious followed her to the car, then left to "make more money," according to Kim.
Here is the part in the end
"forgot to mention that the first time Precious came to the car she left because she felt there was more money to be made. It was after then, that the boys helped her to the car. They carried her by throwing her arms over their shoulders and assisting her walking to the car - I can't remember if only one boy helped or 2."
So, clearly, Precious came to the car and then left.That must have been around 12:20, when she came to the car, and around 12:30, when she tried to go back. Then, she either fell or passed out on the stairs.
After that, boys helped her to the car.


581 posted on 10/14/2006 11:32:55 AM PDT by jennyd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 575 | View Replies]

To: darbymcgill

Well, to be fair, Kim did make it confusing, because she forgot to mention ....
LOL.


582 posted on 10/14/2006 11:34:36 AM PDT by jennyd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 580 | View Replies]

To: jennyd

Just to make it simple (pardon my typos)


Kim Pittman
1602 Albany St
Durham, NC

I, Kim Pittman was called by Melissa to do a Bachelor Party at 6:10 Buchanon St at 11 p.m. at night. W went to Priscilla’s to purchase an outfit for the evening and proceded to get ready for the night. I left 1602 Albany Street and headed toward Buchanon where I arrived at about 11 p.m. I spoke to Dan F. and was told that this was not a bachelor party but a get together amongst friends. They told me that they were on a sports team and were all Grad students at Duke.

I walked to the back of the house with Dan and Dave and entered the house thru a back door. There I received my $400.00 payment ($200 / hr for 2 hours) from Dan and waited for the second girl to arrive. As we waited, I met a

Kim M. Pittman 3/22/06 2:15 p.m.

few of the fellas in the house and chit chatted for several minutes. The guys were anxious and asked me to call Melissa and check on the second girl. We were told that she was soon on her way. At about 11:30 Precious arrived and came to the back where we met for the first time. I waited outside and she went inside to collect her money. She showed me her payment ($400.00) and we went straight to the bathroom where my outfit was to change clothes. Precious came w/ her dancing gear on and did not need to change.

We conversed about our plan for the dance. There was a knock on the door and we were handed too drinks of equal amounts. We did sip the drinks but Precious’ cup fell into the sink. We finished getting dressed and proceeded to the living room, led by Dan to do our show. There were about

Kim M. Pittman 3/22/06 2:15 p.m.
3
20 – 25 young guys there were who were all sitting down. Precious and I began our show which in my opinion seemed to be going well. Precious began showing signs of intoxication at this point. We continued w/ the performance until one of the boy brought out a broomstick and after asking if we had any toys, said he would use the broomstick on us.

That statement made me uncomfortable and I felt like I wanted to leave. I raised my voice to the boys and said the show was over. The commotion riled Precious up and caused to get irate. I went to the bathroom with Precious and I told her I wanted to leave. Precious felt we could get more money and that we shouldn’t leave yet. She was uncontrollable at this point and was

Kim M. Pittman 3/22/06

yelling at the boys who were knocking on the door to leave us alone. I finally decided to leave the house. I left the bathroom, grabbed my bag and exited the house w/ my dancing gear on. I went to my car wanting to leave, but not wanting to leave the girl in the house alone. I changed my clothes in the car where some of the boys were coming to my window asking me to talk to them. I was told by one of the guys that Precious was passed out in the back and could I please do something with her. By this point it seems that the fellas may have been ready for the evening to be over. I told them that if they could get her to my car, I would get her out of their hair. Within minutes, She was being helped out of the back yard and into my car. At this point, she did not have the bag that I saw here come with and I

Kim M Pittman
3/22/06 2:15 p.m.

asked her if she had the most important thing her money. She told me yes but she did not seem coherent. She then told me that we should go back to the house because there was more money to be made there. I asked her again where her things were and she said “Here” “It’s here”. But I did not see here things so in my opinion, she was talking crazy, I made an attempt to get her things, I took my belongings, locked her in my car and went back up to the house to try and retrieve her bag. I looked around w/ Dan and we didn’t see anything so I said I’ve done all I could and went back to my car. I finally began leaving and the boys began yelling ‘Nigger” to us. I called the police to report racial slurs.

While in the car, I repeatedly asked Precious if she had her money. At this point, she was

Kim M. Pittman
3/22/06 2:15 p.m.

basically out of it. I tried to ask her where she lived but she would not tell me. I tried calling Melissa to get a hold of the driver that dropped her off but received no assistance from her. I decided to go to the 24 hr grocery store and seek the help of an off duty police officer. Only a security guard was there, so we proceeded to call 911. A couple of cars came out and the dragged her from my car after trying to wake her up with smelling salts. They tried to talk to her and ask questions but the only thing she would mutter was no. She obviously did not want to leave my car. The police said they would look out for her, take care of her, and that she was in no trouble at all. I then drove back to 1602 Albany Street where my night was over

- forgot to mention that the first

Kim M. Pittman 3/22/06
2:15 p.m.

first time Precious came to the car she left because she felt there was more money to be made. It was after then, that the boys helped to the car. They carried her by throwing her arms over their shoulder and assisting her walking to the car – I can’t remember if only one boy helped or 2.

Kim M. Pittman
3/22/06 2:15 p.m.

The point in time where I went to get Precious’ things from the house, I walked to the back of the house thru the side of the house outside. I enter the house from the outside from a back door. I looked in the bathroom to retrieve her things but could not find them. I exited the house the same way I came in, along the side of the house to my car without finding any of her items

Kim M. Pittman Ki 3/22/06 4:00 p.m.


583 posted on 10/14/2006 11:39:47 AM PDT by darbymcgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 582 | View Replies]

To: darbymcgill
Again, it's probably as truthful as one can expect from Kim.
I am not surprised if she didn't find any of Precious's things. It was the middle of the night, it probably was dark. Kim might have missed those things that fell when Precious fell or passed out on the stairs.
Kim didn't know where the things were, so she might have not paid particular attention to the stairs.
The things could have fallen down under the stairs too, when Precious either fell or passed out.
584 posted on 10/14/2006 11:44:52 AM PDT by jennyd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 583 | View Replies]

To: darbymcgill
There is no doubt that during her interview Kim claimed she was not drinking while Precious drunk. While in her police statement, she said they both sipped the drinks, but Precious' cup fell into the sink and her drink spilled. It is an inconsistency, and she made other inconsistencies, but she came nowhere close to supporting Precious's claim that six men were pulling them apart, 3 men holding Kim, and 3 men dragging Precious into the bathroom.
585 posted on 10/14/2006 11:53:07 AM PDT by jennyd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 576 | View Replies]

To: darbymcgill
Darby, I agree agree with you. Once a person lies about one thing, who's to believe them on another? Kim's credibility is nil. I'm sure if Nifong had been able to get Ms. Kimmy to testify against the boys, the defense would tear her apart on her various inconsistencies. Now that's she's switched teams, it would be crazy to think Nifong won't do the same. A witness' credibility on all things large and small is so necessary.

I hope Sunday night's show focuses on Nifong's refusal to hear from the accused prior to indictment. I think that's the most damaging given all the evidence Seligmann tried to show him.

586 posted on 10/14/2006 11:53:38 AM PDT by Neverforget01 (Republicans resign; Democrats run for reelection)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 583 | View Replies]

To: Neverforget01
Darby, I agree agree with you. Once a person lies about one thing, who's to believe them on another?

Thx NF01...

Kim's credibility is nil.

Unfortunately after this fiasco... so is mine... ;(

587 posted on 10/14/2006 11:58:39 AM PDT by darbymcgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 586 | View Replies]

To: darbymcgill
How many times have we all told our kids that lying is the worst? A person's word is all they have. Once the credibility is gone, it's gone. Kimmie's 911 call did it for me--she lied then. Shy lied when she didn't have to. I don't believe a word out of her mouth. I'm certain the defense is not resting its case on Kim! (With or without the makeover!). The woman is a stripper and a convicted felon, looking to spin for her own advantage--hardly credible witness material.

I just can't wait to hear from the boys themselves, their stories have NEVER changed.

..don't worry darby--I believe you ;-)

588 posted on 10/14/2006 12:11:35 PM PDT by Neverforget01 (Republicans resign; Democrats run for reelection)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 587 | View Replies]

To: darbymcgill; Neverforget01
Unfortunately after this fiasco... so is mine... ;(

I wouldn't say so.

I think Pittman is better to create reasonable doubt than to establish a fact. Lying does not make a witness completely worthless and she will be backed up by 40 other people saying Mangum was not raped, did not appear to have been raped etc. So I think Pittman can help the defense more than she can help Nifong.
589 posted on 10/14/2006 12:43:58 PM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 587 | View Replies]

To: JLS

Pittman AND Mangum create reasonable doubt-- coupled with no physical evidence it's evident this case should never be brought to trial. Hopefully Nifong is gone in Nov and so's this case. These boys deserve their lives back.


590 posted on 10/14/2006 12:50:48 PM PDT by Neverforget01 (Republicans resign; Democrats run for reelection)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 589 | View Replies]

To: Neverforget01

I read somewhere that there won't be much more from Kim then what was shown already. Have no idea what else they have in store for us. I hope they walk Reade through his alibi and have him go through the evidence Nifong refused to look at.


591 posted on 10/14/2006 1:02:02 PM PDT by SarahUSC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 586 | View Replies]

To: Neverforget01
Nifong will have a problem. If he is going to argue Kim should not be believed because of her inconsistencies, how is he going to argue Precious should be believed despite her inconsistencies? Hello? Kim didn't tell completely different stories like Precious did.
592 posted on 10/14/2006 1:26:18 PM PDT by jennyd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 586 | View Replies]

To: jennyd
Actually, Mark Fuhrman made some excellent points, as I recall. I suppose having written those best sellers has made him more knowledgeable about law and research.
593 posted on 10/14/2006 1:58:35 PM PDT by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 561 | View Replies]

To: Dante3

I agree he makes good points. It's just that I don't think he is the best person to be talking about this particular case, considering.


594 posted on 10/14/2006 2:05:10 PM PDT by jennyd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 593 | View Replies]

To: Constitutions Grandchild

I believe you. I understand things smell pretty bad in Kansas City, too. In view of what your son went through, your perspective is understandable. I sincerely hope something good breaks for him soon. I simply wanted to make you aware that what happened to him and the attitude that prevailed does not represent most of LE.

You have an enviable heritage and a great deal to be proud of.

God bless you and your family.


595 posted on 10/14/2006 2:09:50 PM PDT by Jezebelle (Our tax dollars are paying the ACLU to sue the Christ out of us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 552 | View Replies]

To: Fido969

That's awful. Why did she (your ex) do that? I take it the custody change was a separate action she filed for in your civil (divorce) case?


596 posted on 10/14/2006 2:12:31 PM PDT by Jezebelle (Our tax dollars are paying the ACLU to sue the Christ out of us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 554 | View Replies]

To: Sue Perkick

Well. I think them being rats has a great deal to do with it. Look at Louisiana, New Jersey, Chicago, Seattle - all rat-run and teeming with corruption. I know the list is longer - that's just a couple. Most urban areas in the country are rat-run, and that's where these things happen the most by far. When it's a city like Chicago, because it is the only really large city in the state, it is the powerhouse that dictates the policies and tolerance for corruption all the way into state government.


597 posted on 10/14/2006 2:17:24 PM PDT by Jezebelle (Our tax dollars are paying the ACLU to sue the Christ out of us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 555 | View Replies]

To: Constitutions Grandchild

CG, I know it's a filthy, rotten scam, and have echoed your words with regard to this case many times. But I maintain my disagreement with your position that it is the norm. It isn't.


598 posted on 10/14/2006 2:23:36 PM PDT by Jezebelle (Our tax dollars are paying the ACLU to sue the Christ out of us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 557 | View Replies]

To: jennyd

Why not?


599 posted on 10/14/2006 2:26:40 PM PDT by Jezebelle (Our tax dollars are paying the ACLU to sue the Christ out of us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 561 | View Replies]

To: jennyd

Yes, I have seem them laughing about serious matters, too. I wonder if it's just because of a camaraderie thing. But this is extremely serious and these boys and their families are suffering mightily each day. Beyond that, Liefong is publicly undermining the system with the tacit approval of the city fathers. Those boys may as well be in Maoist China or the old (although Russia's current criminal justice system is still about as corrupt as it can be) Soviet Union.


600 posted on 10/14/2006 2:32:11 PM PDT by Jezebelle (Our tax dollars are paying the ACLU to sue the Christ out of us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 563 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 561-580581-600601-620 ... 801-814 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson