Mexico mega-port plan key to 'NAFTA superhighways'

WorldNetDaily.com ^ | October 7, 2006

[Ben Ficklin]

brick bump

[Ben Ficklin]

brick bump

[Ben Ficklin]

brick bump

[Ben Ficklin]

brick bump

[Ben Ficklin]

brick bump

[Ben Ficklin]

brick bump

[Ben Ficklin]

brickbump

[Ben Ficklin]

thread crap bump

[Ben Ficklin]

thread crap bump

[Ben Ficklin]

thread crap bump

[Ben Ficklin]

thread crap bump

[Smartass]

Rude, as a true red, white and blue American, you're not
only a very good and honorable person, but very
observant too. You make everyone proud.
Games over for now, got to run.

 

[gafusa]

Scary because the logical way for a constitutional NAU is easy, just absorb Canada inot the US proper. The US has 300 million people, Mexico 100, and Canada 30. Plus we completely dominate economically. Absorb Canada, make Mexico a US protectorate, and then we can have a NAU without giving up our freedoms or sovereignty. This current method the gomvenrt is pursuing make no sense.

[Czar]

"Corsi hasn't earned any credibility on this subject."

Your opinion. Mine differs.

"And a significant portion of his speculation on the subject has been proven inaccurate."

Maybe yes, maybe no. Speculation by its nature is not fact nor is it necessarily based entirely on fact. If it was, we wouldn't need to call it "speculation". Hence, the fact that subsequent facts may have shown it to be inaccurate is neither here nor there. We're all entitled to speculate. Corsi may hit some and miss some. Just which significant portion of his speculation has been proven wrong, as you allege?

"...when he informs us what he's found, then we all can make a decision on his credibility."

I already have, but I will be very interested in anything new Corsi may have to say.

[Smartass]

"When he begins to babble, you know you've won..."

LOL, for sure he's a babbler.   I think he dropped all of those bricks on his toes, because he's wimpering (learned that word from my teacher Rude $$$) the thread.

Got to run...
:o)

 

[1rudeboy]

It's not the speculation that Corsi gets wrong that's bothersome, it's the facts he gets wrong. The first, as you point out, is a matter of opinion but the second is not.

I'll go back and find a fact he's gotten wrong, but later.

[Czar]

"No, Corsi has no credibility because the feds have nothing to do with TTC 35."

You mean you believe the feds have nothing to do with it. In fact, it is very hard for me to believe the feds don't have their big noses into this as well as having a vote. The fact that it hasn't been disclosed doesn't mean they aren't involved.

"There are many things that Corsi doesn't know about it or is wrong about it."

Lets not assume facts not in evidence. Yet to be proven.

[texastoo]

Those of you that claim that the SPP has not been kept a secret are wrong. The Freedom of Information Act had to be used to get the facts. I wonder why this was kept secret. Any one want to speculate?

[Ben Ficklin]

"Facts not in evidence"

This article is a perfect example. Talk of expanding Punta Colomet began as a result of the strike. But all of a sudden, years later, its a threat to the nation?

And of course, it is mostly irrelevant. The Port Of Houston has been expanded for the meantime and Lazaro Cardenas will take up the slack. Importers and retailers are just not going to let their throats be cut by the union again.

[1rudeboy]

I'll speculate that it was "kept secret" for the same reason you don't see internal policy proposals published in WND from the FCC, or the Bureau of Land Management, or whatever.

_____

I can't find any of Jerome Corsi's articles on the NAU in his WND archive. Can anybody?