'Shadow' agency to issue N. American border passes

WND ^ | 9/27/06 | WND

[B4Ranch]

Do you believe there should be a federal investigation of U.S. government efforts to support a North American Union?

Yes 97% 10130 votes

No 3% 349 votes
Total: 10479 votes

Lou Dobbs is now labeled a Conspiracy Theorist by the CFR for reporting about the North American Union Merger.

Watch this clip on www.youtube.com

YouTube - WHOSE AMERICA?: Lou Dobbs on The North American Union
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pCXc8j05Y3w


Also see:
CNN.com - Lou Dobbs Tonight
http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/lou.dobbs.tonight/

[B4Ranch]

ping

[texastoo]

I didn't catch Lou Dobbs tonight. Thanks for the links. Lou Dobbs was just flabbergasted by Pastor. LOL
Anyone who disagrees with Pastor will be called a conspiracy nut. However, anyone who agrees with Pastor will be called a Marxist or Communist.

[hedgetrimmer]

The American people ARE paying attention, in spite of 1rudeboy's efforts. Do you think the people who are paying him will fire him now?

[Smartass]

To me, open border lobbyists here are irrelevant.
Of course the American public are paying attention.
No comment on 1rudeboy$

The main thing is, the truth and facts are coming out.

 

[B4Ranch]

I think they SPP Gang is nervous because of all the media attraction this has been getting.

[texastoo]

I found this report by the Independent Task Force on Building a North American Community. In the Acknowledgement good old Senator John Cornyn is recognized.

http://canada.usembassy.gov/content/can_usa/northamericancommunity_TF_final.pdf#search=%22nafta%20office%20inter-american%20affAIRS%20john%20cornyn%22

On page 22 of 49 it tells why NAFTA was created for Mexico. LOL It even reports in this paragraph that the World Bank estimates that Mexico needs $20 billion a year for infrastructure and education.

Then on page 37 of 59 it suggests implementing the Social Security totalization agreement between Mexico and the U.S.

At the very top of page 38 of 59 this article suggest that none of this will work until the wages of the two North American countries are diminished to Mexicos wages.

[B4Ranch]

How many Senators are still in office proud that they signed the NAFTA agreement. How many are running for reelection today?

[Smartass]

Good find.

[wolfcreek]

Lou Dobbs is now labeled a Conspiracy Theorist by the CFR for reporting about the North American Union Merger.



When We start hearing name calling and insults from Pastor and his gang of elitist, We have to believe they think their secret is out. Look for a long, drawn out rebuttal from these guys coming soon.

[hedgetrimmer]

1.NAFTA was designed to create new opportunities for trade and investment in Mexico and thus complement Mexican development programs. Officials hoped that Mexico would grow much faster than its more industrialized partners and begin to narrow the income gap among the three countries. However, investment has been modest, preventing Mexico from achieving higher levels of growth. Indeed, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) estimated that, with significant levels of investment, Mexico’s potential growth rate could reach 6 percent. But that requires big changes in current policies. For example, the World Bank estimated in 2000 that $20 billion per year for a decade is needed for essential infrastructure and educational projects in Mexico.

2.Mexico said Friday it will try to persuade President Bush not to sign a bill that would extend a wall along the border in an effort to stop illegal immigrants.

There are an estimated 11 million Mexicans in the United States, about half of whom are illegal. Last year, Mexican migrants sent home more than $20 billion in remittances, providing Mexico with its second biggest source of foreign income after oil.

CAFTA An estimated 12 million Latin American migrants in the United States send more than $40 billion a year to their relatives in their native countries, according to Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) estimates. About $20 billion a year goes to Mexico, $10 billion to Central America and the Dominican Republic, and much of the rest to Colombia, Brazil, Peru and other South American countries.

The massive migration of Latin American men is leaving behind fatherless children, who often grow up raised by grandparents who tend to be too permissive.

As a result, millions of children are growing up on the streets. In countries with high youth unemployment rates, they often end up doing criminal jobs for drug-trafficking or other organized-crime gangs, other experts said. According to the latest World Health Organization figures, Latin America is the most violent region in the world after Africa

All, this is the purpose of "free trade" and one of the dire consequences of it. Multiply these disasters to every country we are trading with under FTAs

[texastoo]

I know that you all probably read more than I do. I'm curious to know if this article was posted in the U.S. It seems strange that this article would be found on the U.S. Embassy in Canada website. In the introduction there is a disclaimer in bold print saying that this is not in any way connected to the U.S. government. Then these meddlers from Mexico and Canada have the audacity to tell Americans what to do and these idiots even think they have the smarts to spend American money. This is even after their admission of the failure of NAFTA. LOL.Of course, there are some American socialists in this also.

To find Senator Cornyn's name in the Acknowledgement was surprising.

http://canada.usembassy.gov/content/can_usa/northamericancommunity_TF_final.pdf#search=%22nafta%20office%20inter-american%20affAIRS%20john%20cornyn%22

[texastoo]

How many Senators are still in office proud that they signed the NAFTA agreement. How many are running for reelection today?

I really don't know the answer to that question. I do recall a lot of arm twisting during the CAFTA vote and breaking the "time" rules. We have NAFTA and CAFTA. This is a list of our bilateral agreements.

The US has bilateral agreements with the following countries and blocs:

Australia / U.S.-Australia Free Trade Agreement (2004)

Bahrain / US-Bahrain Free Trade Agreement (Signed 2004; Ratified 2005; Implemented 2006)

Chile / US-Chile Free Trade Agreement (Signed and Ratified 2003; Implemented 2004)

Israel / US-Israel Free Trade Agreement (Signed, Ratified and Implemented 1985. The Palestinian Authority is also participating.)

Jordan / US-Jordan Free Trade Agreement (Signed 2000, Ratified and Implemented 2001)

Morocco / US-Morocco Free Trade Agreement (Signed and Ratified 2004, Implemented 2006)

Oman / US-Oman Free Trade Agreement (Signed and Ratified 2006)

Singapore / US-Singapore Free Trade Agreement (Signed and Ratified 2003, Implemented 2004)

With all these "free trade agreements" we should all be healthy, wealthy and wise. You know "free trade agreements" have saved us. S/

[Paul Ross]

Wow. This is a tremendously important find. As you note from the bottom of page 38 to the top of page 39:

Move to full labor mobility between Canada and the United States. To make companies based in North America as competitive as possible in the global economy, Canada and the United States should consider eliminating all remaining barriers to the ability of their citizens to live and work in the other country. This free flow of people would offer an important advantage to employers in both countries by giving them rapid access to a larger pool of skilled labor, and would enhance the well-being of individuals in both countries by enabling them to move quickly to where their skills are needed. In the long term, the two countries should work to extend this policy to Mexico as well, though doing so will not be practical until wage differentials between Mexico and its two North American neighbors have diminished considerably.

Your interpretation of this document is entirely reasonable, since Mexican wages are indeed not coming up to the U.S. or Canadian level, that it infers that "... none of this will work until the wages of the two North American countries are diminished to Mexicos wages."

[1rudeboy]

Please see my comment #12.

[1rudeboy]

Did you have a question for me, or are you simply whimpering?

[1rudeboy]

The American people ARE paying attention, in spite of 1rudeboy's efforts.

Darn! I told my bosses at the CFR that creating websites where people can find information for themselves was a bad idea. How was I supposed to know that Jerome Corsi would tell people they exist?

[1rudeboy]

Wow. This is a tremendously important find.

You cannot be serious. That's the CFR document we've been discussing here for months. Now, I understand that a good number of people haven't read it, but it's really not that long.

[Smartass]

"Did you have a question for me, or are you simply whimpering?"

No, but since you asked...answer the question, that you refused to answer once before:

How can a person like yourself, sit on the same threads, with the same topics, arguing with same people for 7/24, and not get paid for it? It appears there are others, but 1rudegirl is the only one full time? What Open Border Lobby firm are you working for? I'm sure you can fake it through that one! waiting.

 

[bitt]

huh. good work, SA!