Replies

I found this report by the Independent Task Force on Building a North American Community. In the Acknowledgement good old Senator John Cornyn is recognized.

http://canada.usembassy.gov/content/can_usa/northamericancommunity_TF_final.pdf#search=%22nafta%20office%20inter-american%20affAIRS%20john%20cornyn%22

On page 22 of 49 it tells why NAFTA was created for Mexico. LOL It even reports in this paragraph that the World Bank estimates that Mexico needs $20 billion a year for infrastructure and education.

Then on page 37 of 59 it suggests implementing the Social Security totalization agreement between Mexico and the U.S.

At the very top of page 38 of 59 this article suggest that none of this will work until the wages of the two North American countries are diminished to Mexicos wages.

1.NAFTA was designed to create new opportunities for trade and investment in Mexico and thus complement Mexican development programs. Officials hoped that Mexico would grow much faster than its more industrialized partners and begin to narrow the income gap among the three countries. However, investment has been modest, preventing Mexico from achieving higher levels of growth. Indeed, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) estimated that, with significant levels of investment, Mexico’s potential growth rate could reach 6 percent. But that requires big changes in current policies. For example, the World Bank estimated in 2000 that $20 billion per year for a decade is needed for essential infrastructure and educational projects in Mexico.

2.Mexico said Friday it will try to persuade President Bush not to sign a bill that would extend a wall along the border in an effort to stop illegal immigrants.

There are an estimated 11 million Mexicans in the United States, about half of whom are illegal. Last year, Mexican migrants sent home more than $20 billion in remittances, providing Mexico with its second biggest source of foreign income after oil.

CAFTA An estimated 12 million Latin American migrants in the United States send more than $40 billion a year to their relatives in their native countries, according to Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) estimates. About $20 billion a year goes to Mexico, $10 billion to Central America and the Dominican Republic, and much of the rest to Colombia, Brazil, Peru and other South American countries.

The massive migration of Latin American men is leaving behind fatherless children, who often grow up raised by grandparents who tend to be too permissive.

As a result, millions of children are growing up on the streets. In countries with high youth unemployment rates, they often end up doing criminal jobs for drug-trafficking or other organized-crime gangs, other experts said. According to the latest World Health Organization figures, Latin America is the most violent region in the world after Africa

All, this is the purpose of "free trade" and one of the dire consequences of it. Multiply these disasters to every country we are trading with under FTAs

Wow. This is a tremendously important find. As you note from the bottom of page 38 to the top of page 39:

Move to full labor mobility between Canada and the United States. To make companies based in North America as competitive as possible in the global economy, Canada and the United States should consider eliminating all remaining barriers to the ability of their citizens to live and work in the other country. This free flow of people would offer an important advantage to employers in both countries by giving them rapid access to a larger pool of skilled labor, and would enhance the well-being of individuals in both countries by enabling them to move quickly to where their skills are needed. In the long term, the two countries should work to extend this policy to Mexico as well, though doing so will not be practical until wage differentials between Mexico and its two North American neighbors have diminished considerably.

Your interpretation of this document is entirely reasonable, since Mexican wages are indeed not coming up to the U.S. or Canadian level, that it infers that "... none of this will work until the wages of the two North American countries are diminished to Mexicos wages."