Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anna Nicole 'pockets £300,000' from pictures of dead son
Daily Mail ^ | September 19, 2006

Posted on 09/20/2006 10:12:53 AM PDT by Ganymede

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
To: PennsylvaniaMom
You're right. Look at the Tom Cruise-Brad Pitt, and all the other celebrities that prostitute pictures of their spawn for big bucks. No difference to me.
21 posted on 09/20/2006 10:30:31 AM PDT by bigfootbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: petercooper

If she knew her son was going to die and she was going tosell the pictures, she would have fixed herself up a little better.


22 posted on 09/20/2006 10:33:41 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor

I expect a mother to love her child, and to do whatever it takes to ensure his survival. That should not surprise anyone.


23 posted on 09/20/2006 10:35:57 AM PDT by widowithfoursons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: widowithfoursons; Mikey_1962; HEY4QDEMS; jpl; massgopguy; reagan_fanatic; daybreakcoming; pnz1
"There is no way to express the sickness of this woman if this proves true."

What is sick about it? She would have made money from the photos even if he had lived. Perhaps not as much but it isn't her fault that the photos were bid up after he died. Anyone who thinks these were just family photos she decided to sell after her son died is clueless.

Celebrities often invite a photo agency to photograph their new borns. They do this for two reasons. One is that they don't want to risk the health of their babies by taking the new born out of the hospital and into a crowd of paparazzi all fighting each other to get the first photos. Another is to make money for charities or for a trust fund for their babies.

There is nothing "sick" about it.
24 posted on 09/20/2006 10:45:23 AM PDT by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
"She could have just posted the pics on the Internet and then there would have been no way for anyone to make money off the pics."

The tabloids would still make money off of them. She would have just saved them the expense of having to pay for them. Anyway, why is it her responsibility to make the photos available to the public?
25 posted on 09/20/2006 10:48:20 AM PDT by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: jdm

Not that I am really following this all that close...but...Cyril Wecht (former Coroner of Allegheny County--Pittsburgh--so it is in the local media quite a bit) said that he saw no evidence of foul play and that his autopsy results would be pending the return of toxicology tests. His thoughts, and he tends to be incredibly accurate and articulate, were that DS had unfortunately took several harmless meds (one being the depression script) and that the mixture would be found to have adversely affect DS's central nervous system. Again, Dr. Wecht said no foul play evidence on the body.


26 posted on 09/20/2006 10:50:42 AM PDT by PennsylvaniaMom (Take the high road...the view is always better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: monday; dfwgator
The tabloids would still make money off of them. She would have just saved them the expense of having to pay for them.

I think you have the right idea, Monday. We really don't know who took the photos (maybe the lawyer, maybe Daniel, or maybe a hospital staff member--as a favor, etc., or a trusted member of the media--to control the release of the photos, ala Cruise and Brangelina.) In any event it is obvious that the photos predate Daniel's passing, so in addition to the grief, her people had to think...hey what about those photos they just took?

27 posted on 09/20/2006 10:55:40 AM PDT by PennsylvaniaMom (Take the high road...the view is always better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: PennsylvaniaMom

"We really don't know who took the photos "

It was a photographer from the photo agency Getty. They took the photos of the BABY for planned release to the media. It was just fate that Daniel was even in the photos.

Her people didn't have to think about what to do with the photos because they were always in the hands of Getty who auctioned them off just as had been agreed before Daniel even died.


28 posted on 09/20/2006 11:08:01 AM PDT by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: monday

Thank you for clarifying that. Btw, Hollywood Grind, is now posting that DS was hospitalized, for several days, in an CCU for an elevated heartrate and stomache problems. It also reports the drugs were the scripts Lexapro (anti-depressant) and Ambien (sleep aid).


29 posted on 09/20/2006 11:16:29 AM PDT by PennsylvaniaMom (Take the high road...the view is always better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Ganymede

This is easy to believe.she is,after all,nothing more than (and nothing less than) a cheap,dim witted,amoral tramp.


30 posted on 09/20/2006 11:38:36 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative ("An empty limousine pulled up and Hillary Clinton got out")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ron in Acreage

I heard on the radio this morning that she will be using most of the funds on a memorial for her son. No mention of what type of memorial.


31 posted on 09/20/2006 11:48:33 AM PDT by girlscout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

Why would an American go to Bahama to give birth?


32 posted on 09/20/2006 11:52:20 AM PDT by ValerieUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: petercooper; xsmommy; secret garden

The picture in post #5 reminds me of the true value of the makeup artist in Hollywood.


33 posted on 09/20/2006 11:57:22 AM PDT by WhyisaTexasgirlinPA (Go Big 12 Football!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ValerieUSA
Why would an American go to Bahama to give birth?

I read that she was recently granted permanent residency status by the Bahamian government.If this is true,it could be that she'll,at some point,renounce her US citizenship and,thus,possibly save a ton of $$ in US taxes if she wins the estate battle.

34 posted on 09/20/2006 11:59:20 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative ("An empty limousine pulled up and Hillary Clinton got out")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Ganymede

Profiteering, profiteering, and more profiteering...


35 posted on 09/20/2006 12:06:09 PM PDT by Mrs. Darla Ruth Schwerin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ganymede

Hey, if this is her way of dealing with the loss of her son, who are we to judge her in this time of grief?


36 posted on 09/20/2006 12:16:31 PM PDT by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

I think if you buy RE in the Bahamas you 'are' a citizen (no renouncing of your actual citizenship). Its kind of an honorary thing.


37 posted on 09/20/2006 12:22:28 PM PDT by PennsylvaniaMom (Take the high road...the view is always better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: WhyisaTexasgirlinPA; secret garden

is that dirt or the famed pregnancy MASK that is making her face look like that? or my eyes/monitor?


38 posted on 09/20/2006 12:31:54 PM PDT by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: xsmommy

She looks like she's been in a tanning bed. Anna Nicole, Pamela Anderson and Heather Locklear are all ladies who need make-up to look even mildly acceptable.


39 posted on 09/20/2006 12:36:14 PM PDT by brwnsuga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: brwnsuga
i don't know, i think she looks hideous in this pic WITH makeup, i would take the unevenly tanned face without makeup over this...

i think she looks like a transvestite!

40 posted on 09/20/2006 12:39:35 PM PDT by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson