Not sure what you are talking about now - you implied Natural Selection is not deliberate - what is the opposite of deliberate? RANDAM!!!! BINGO WE HAVE A WINNER!
Enough tap-dancing. If Natural Selection is not random please state the pattern, aim, or reason. Natural Selection has no aim and no reason and no pattern. If you want to argue the point - simply explain the aim, reason or pattern. (it "just is" is not a pattern)
Do you not know how to use a thesaurus (some are free and online)? You are now claiming that deliberate is not the opposite of random - do a little research. Accidental is an antonym to deliberate and accidental is a synonym for random - You are flat-out wrong. Check it out for yourself - something you should have done before you made your bogus comment