I made no such statement. Not sure what you are talking about now - you implied Natural Selection is not deliberate - what is the opposite of deliberate? RANDAM!!!! BINGO WE HAVE A WINNER!
Enough tap-dancing. If Natural Selection is not random please state the pattern, aim, or reason. Natural Selection has no aim and no reason and no pattern. If you want to argue the point - simply explain the aim, reason or pattern. (it "just is" is not a pattern)
Not sure what you are talking about now - you implied Natural Selection is not deliberate - what is the opposite of deliberate? RANDAM!!!! BINGO WE HAVE A WINNER!
Neither "random" nor "RANDAM" are
antonyms of "deliberate". You are attempting to argue based upon false definitions.
Enough tap-dancing. If Natural Selection is not random please state the pattern, aim, or reason.
The pattern has been explained. Your rebuttal that a pattern requires design or deliberate intent is false, thus your rebuttal is invalid.