Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: darbymcgill

There probably is more to it. Correct me if I'm wrong (and I'm sure you will - :-)), but if a L.E. agent or member of the D.A.'s office has been shown to be corrupt in the management of a case (unlawful searches, prosecutorial misconduct, etc.), doesn't that automatically open up all cases the individual who has been found so guilty was connected with for judicial review? I've heard that is the case and that it is a major can of worms to open for the L.E. and Judiciary. No body wants ANYBODY on their L.E. team to be found with poopoo on their shoes, cause once you step in it, you can never get it off.


43 posted on 09/19/2006 10:30:00 AM PDT by Constitutions Grandchild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: Constitutions Grandchild
doesn't that automatically open up all cases the individual who has been found so guilty was connected with for judicial review?

Yes, you are absolutely correct... read about Joyce Gilchrist, it will make you want to scream.....

46 posted on 09/19/2006 11:05:47 AM PDT by darbymcgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

To: Constitutions Grandchild
It also would makes you say "hmmmmmm" when even before the official DNA results came back from the SBI that Nifong was shopping for a more "qualified" private test facility.

I say, hmmmmmm, how many innocents are in prison now because of the "known" inabilities of the SBI labs? I'll bet there's a lawyer of two in N.C. re-looking at some DNA involved case files.

49 posted on 09/19/2006 11:12:26 AM PDT by darbymcgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson