Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: All
"It was an open-and-shut thing and the statements were consistent," Chalmers said. "The only thing we weren't able to substantiate was the racial slur."

from this article

Doesn't this statement by Chalmers imply that blacks may sometimes lie about racial slurs?

32 posted on 09/19/2006 5:58:06 AM PDT by darbymcgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: darbymcgill

Another implication of his statement could be that the "blue wall of silence" is more protective of bigots than it is of abusive cowards.


33 posted on 09/19/2006 6:06:40 AM PDT by darbymcgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: darbymcgill

Couldn't substantiate racial slurs at Blinco's , but could at 610 Buchanan? The latter certainly has been reported as fact over and over.


34 posted on 09/19/2006 6:39:23 AM PDT by Neverforget01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: darbymcgill; Neverforget01

There's a reason why Chalmer's has been mum all along in regard to the Duke LAX case. Now he comes to bat for Gottlieb's Duke arrest record. Amazing how the "only" unsubstantiated fact in the Blinco's incident was the racial slur.

There's more here ...


35 posted on 09/19/2006 6:57:30 AM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson