Replies

To: Swordmaker

look at the DDR2 800 i listed its 4-4-4-12 and thats at DDR2 800(If you didn't know DDR2 800 at cas5 is still faster than DDR 667 at cas5) lol

26 posted on 09/14/2006 1:10:49 AM PDT by Echo Talon

To: Echo Talon

look at the DDR2 800 i listed its 4-4-4-12 and thats at DDR2 800(If you didn't know DDR2 800 at cas5 is still faster than DDR 667 at cas5) lo

Uh, no... you listed no DDR2 800... just some 667 and 1066.

31 posted on 09/14/2006 1:41:28 AM PDT by Swordmaker (Remember, the proper pronunciation of IE is "AAAAIIIIIEEEEEEE!)

To: Echo Talon

look at the DDR2 800 i listed its 4-4-4-12 and thats at DDR2 800(If you didn't know DDR2 800 at cas5 is still faster than DDR 667 at cas5) lol

I don't see that any of these that are ECC... if you go ECC add about 20% to the cost and I think it adds a latency hit.

33 posted on 09/14/2006 1:52:23 AM PDT by Swordmaker (Remember, the proper pronunciation of IE is "AAAAIIIIIEEEEEEE!)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794