So 14 percent actually have an honest approach to judging this. How the hell are we supposed to know if it's a fair dramatization or not if we haven't seen it?
I went against instinct and voted for the honest answer myself.
Here's a an example of my twisted "tinfoil hat" mental processes: Suppose this "dramatization" is made to portray that Clinton's regime did undermine the efforts to get OBL. The network plainly states that this is a drama and has some factually incorrect scenes. The Clinton folks scream bloody murder about "the lies lies scandalous LIES". So the public is actually given reinforcement that Clinton did NO wrong in the 911 affair when in all likelihood, the miniseries is factually correct! Whoa...deep. This doesn't harm the Clinton legacy in the eyes of the sheeple, it strengthens it as a media archive.
86 out of 100 viewers are incapable of a freestanding thought.
86 out of 100 msnbc men ask permission of their wives/significant others if they can take a position on anything.
86 out of 100 women are mindless, subservient sex toys to 86 out of 100 imbicilic men.
This could get to be fun .. add your own.