Skip to comments.
Steorn: our technology creates free energy.
Steorn.net ^
Posted on 08/28/2006 2:26:14 PM PDT by batmast
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-78 next last
To: kinoxi
According to their website, they've had over 3000 scientists sign up to test it. They will close down the application process on Sept. 8.
Over 46K peole have registered to recieve the results.
21
posted on
08/28/2006 2:54:54 PM PDT
by
AFreeBird
(... Burn the land and boil the sea's, but you can't take the skies from me.)
To: batmast
I don't think that this guy is a con man because he is going to the scientific community to test the validity of his claims. If he was a con man he would try to sell his invention to suckers as fast as he could.
Having wrote that, he may be wrong in his calculations. I would like to see some real tests by real scientists.
To: batmast
Repeal the laws of thermodynamics now bump.
To: AFreeBird
I read that they have gotten 46k emails. An Ad in The Economist should generate as much. A prototype shouldn't require all this grandstanding though. If it works, I'd buy it.
24
posted on
08/28/2006 2:59:44 PM PDT
by
kinoxi
To: batmast
A wonderful thought...live out in the middle of no where...with plenty of energy...all the goodies without that awful grid...
25
posted on
08/28/2006 3:03:01 PM PDT
by
shield
(A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand; but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc 10:2)
To: pabianice
LOL! Wehere is that from?
26
posted on
08/28/2006 3:04:07 PM PDT
by
expatpat
To: zert_28
I don't think that this guy is a con man because he is going to the scientific community to test the validity of his claims. If he was a con man he would try to sell his invention to suckers as fast as he could. Or he could be a very successful con man selling to people as gullible as you. Invest now before the results are may public and beat the rush.
27
posted on
08/28/2006 3:05:30 PM PDT
by
thackney
(life is fragile, handle with prayer)
To: thackney
Bandini Scam? Perpetual motion, of course...
The scam always falls apart when the huckster forgets to feed the squirrel on the treadmill....
Be Seeing You,
Chris
28
posted on
08/28/2006 3:08:26 PM PDT
by
section9
(Major Motoko Kusanagi says, "Jesus is Coming. Everybody look busy...")
To: batmast
Those who were prepared to complete testing have all confirmed our claims; however none will publicly go on record.
Mmm-hmmm....
:rolling eyes:
29
posted on
08/28/2006 3:08:32 PM PDT
by
reagan_fanatic
(What Darwin denied he now regrets)
To: shield
I just saw this guy on FOX. They were treating him as legit.
30
posted on
08/28/2006 3:13:17 PM PDT
by
WVNan
To: Bloody Sam Roberts
So, what if they're doing nothing more than tapping a previously unknown source of energy?
I mean magnets existed before someone figured out that if you spin a coil around them, some form of energy generated.
Aren't we all surrounded by electricity and magnetism everyday; weak low levels to be sure.
But then some whales eat microscopic plankton. They just developed the way to feed on that vast quanity of microscopic organisms.
Anyway, so what if these guys accidently stumbled onto a way to tap into the other forces that surround us? It may not violate the "laws", just found an additional source and one possible way to tap it.
31
posted on
08/28/2006 3:13:43 PM PDT
by
AFreeBird
(... Burn the land and boil the sea's, but you can't take the skies from me.)
To: AFreeBird
So, what if they're doing nothing more than tapping a previously unknown source of energy?
I mean magnets existed before someone figured out that if you spin a coil around them, some form of energy generated. That doesn't make or capture energy. It transformes the mechanical energy used to spin the shaft to electrical energy in the wires. After losses for resistance and friction given up for heat. The inputs to the system equal the outputs to the system. New discoveries do not overturn basic laws; only use them in new applications.
32
posted on
08/28/2006 3:19:08 PM PDT
by
thackney
(life is fragile, handle with prayer)
To: ichabod1
I'll invest! Me too. I'll take 5¢ worth.
33
posted on
08/28/2006 3:20:15 PM PDT
by
Fiddlstix
(Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
To: thackney
Well, they are supposedly paying all the direct costs of the validation process. I suppose that also entails the scientists time. They are also refusing any and all investment inquiries until after the validation process is done and the results have been published.
Gee, I don't know, they've gone very public, are paying for the studies, which I assume means opening up all materials and processes to the jury, and aren't asking for any money.
If they fail, it will be most public and will probably ruin their existing business, personal reputaions and the jobs of their current employees.
Seems to me that they've at least earned the benefit of the doubt until the verdict is in.
34
posted on
08/28/2006 3:20:41 PM PDT
by
AFreeBird
(... Burn the land and boil the sea's, but you can't take the skies from me.)
To: batmast
The vast majority of these institutions refused to even look at the technology, however several did. Those who were prepared to complete testing have all confirmed our claims; however none will publicly go on record. We know how shy institutions are about being involved with history making technology. They probably wouldn't even mention it in the alumni letter.
35
posted on
08/28/2006 3:23:17 PM PDT
by
Moonman62
(The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
To: AFreeBird
Seems to me that they've at least earned the benefit of the doubt until the verdict is in. The method of very public claims prior to verification make me doubt this very much. I suspect, with nothing to back it up but my own suspicions and basic knowledge of physics, that all investment inquiries are not turned down. That is only a image to put forth while bigger private investment is being accepted.
36
posted on
08/28/2006 3:25:39 PM PDT
by
thackney
(life is fragile, handle with prayer)
To: Normal4me
"I don't care how they do it, if it's FREE I want me some! :-)"
heck, I will take $2.00 worth
37
posted on
08/28/2006 3:26:17 PM PDT
by
sure_fine
(*not one to over kill the thought process*)
To: batmast
Military has had anti gravity, free energy technology for years.
Diggity
38
posted on
08/28/2006 3:28:00 PM PDT
by
Diggity
To: thackney
That doesn't make or capture energy. It transformes the mechanical energy used to spin the shaft to electrical energy in the wires. Umm, so Magnetism has no inherit electrical properties, and the magnetic portion of the equation doesn't matter? When we generate electricity, are we really generating it or just the current to move it through the wires and do work for us?
39
posted on
08/28/2006 3:32:46 PM PDT
by
AFreeBird
(... Burn the land and boil the sea's, but you can't take the skies from me.)
To: batmast
It also provides a secure supply of energy, since the components of the technology are readily available.Yeah, but when we finally build that wall on the Mexican border the ready availability might be compromised.
40
posted on
08/28/2006 3:33:23 PM PDT
by
layman
(Card Carrying Infidel)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-78 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson