Replies

To: beyond the sea

I was on the fence about Karr being the real killer until I saw the shot of the yearbook entry on TV. I don't know about you, but I have never had (or known) anyone to write in a yearbook "shall be the conqueror". The odds of this being purely coincidental are astronomical

30 posted on 08/20/2006 5:49:06 AM PDT by flair2000

31 posted on 08/20/2006 5:55:09 AM PDT by Rte66

The "Victory" on the ransom note more or less clarifies it. He can make the initials mean whatever he says they mean at this point. We know he lies! We know he's wierd. And we know that he thinks "he's really, really clever".

The Ransom note makes no sense. You don't leave a "critically placed" ransom note when the victim is already dead.....

But put it with his latest "Live camera" statement: "It was an accident" and it's one of those "See, I never intended to kill her. The note is proof."

He went on to say "That makes it 2nd degree not 1st degree murder".

He didn't think the note out carefully enough. The note was to prove that "he was smarter and more powerful than John Ramsey" by killing what he loved most. VICTORY

There is no sign of any "love" for Jonbenet in the ransom note.

32 posted on 08/20/2006 6:45:43 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)

To: flair2000; beyond the sea

If the SBTC thing was really a trope with him, he will have left it in multiple places down the years. Nutjobs always do. The phrase "multiple peace," though, makes bells ring and sirens sound.

35 posted on 08/20/2006 10:19:21 AM PDT by dsc

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794