To: Conservative Texan Mom
She did exactly what our DA usually does and I consider him the best: "We have someone" and he has been charged....but he never reveals or discusses any of the evidence.
It's important to get the face out there ASAP....before the public loses interest.
If they waited a week to get his face out there, it would be old news. People want "current" news...What happened yesterday??
Isn't/wasn't Walsh going to do another show on this case just before they picked Karr up?
114 posted on
08/19/2006 2:06:28 PM PDT by
Sacajaweau
(God Bless Our Troops!!)
To: Sacajaweau
Walsh has talked about this case before. I don't know if it was scheduled to air again.
The part in the Ransom note referring to beheading strikes me as odd. This was ten years ago, terrorism wasn't the issue that it is now. Beheaded? It is interesting that John Walsh's son, another high profile child murder case, was beheaded. I wonder if the author of the note kept tabs on high profile cases?
I think you are right? They have to have more evidence than what we know. I can't imagine them arresting him without it. And, it would not be smart to tip their hand as to what they know. It would also be interesting to see what blanks get filled in now that this guy's picture is out. I'm still wondering about the DNA though.
117 posted on
08/19/2006 2:23:54 PM PDT by
Conservative Texan Mom
(Some people say I'm stubborn, when it's usually just that I'm right.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson