My question is: In light of the Democrat Judge's ruling about NSA wire tapping/surveillance being unConstitutional re private citizens' rights, can't ANY lawyer NOW use such tactics as in this case with the e-mail/letters be used as a defense?
Sounds like a potential but horrific can of worms being opened here.
Ah, c'mon, what the heck is the Internet good for if not speculation?
I have yet to see anything in this case that leads me to believe Karr could actually be the killer. Evidently, the Ramsey's did not know him, so how did he get into the house? How did he get away without leaving footprints in the snow? How did he lure Patsy out of her room without awaking other members of the household? Etc, etc, etc.
I think Patsy must have been delighted when she heard about Karr. She finally had a "patsy" of her own. One that might exonerate her and her family's obvious complicity for all of history.
Seriously, the guy is Fruit-Loops and that's that.
Karr signed his high school yearbook with the odd phrase, "I Shall Be The Conqueror."
The ransom note left at the scene was signed, "SBTC."
The odds are that it's just a coincidence, but then maybe not.
I record some client phone calls. It's like taking notes....the easy way.
Karr is just "pretending" a lot of times. I'm sure he "wanted" the stuff to be "passed on". His Ransom Note is the same thing. He likes to create confusion. He thinks he's clever. Why leave a ransom note for a dead girl? To prove it was an accident if he ever gets caught? He didn't think that one out really good.
He's sick smart...like the Unabomber who was captured only a few months before (April 1996). It almost looks like Karr takes bits and pieces from other crimes and tries to perfect them.