The Aryan bible didn't take the jews out. It turned Jesus into an Aryan, to distance Him further from the Jews who were held as being responsible for his death. Furthermore it didn't appear till the '40s and was never produced in great quantity. Most Germans would never have seen one, and Hitler never referred to it in his speeches to them.
The Christian myth was produced by a number of historians fearful of the truth of his mythology and satanic worship being exposed. Fact is he murdered thousands of ministers and priests who were found preaching the gospel.
Really, Hitler (or presumably you actually mean other Germans (who would themselves have been more than 90% Christians) killed thousands of ministers and priests for "preaching the gospel". Doubtless you can cite a source for that claim? How did this sit with the 90%+ of Germans who were Christians?
His connections to evolution and satanic ritual were pretty well written about after the war. Read Mien Kompf and say he is not for weeding Aryan society.
Weeding Aryan society (whatever that may have been) had nothing to do with evolution. For every evolutionary reference in any part of of Hitler's published or spoken work I'll supply you with 10 references in which he invokes the Christian God or Christ himself. You REALLY don't want to go down the adverse consequences route; it is far worse for Christianity than for evolution.
Fewer and fewer are believing Darwin, while more and more are believing Creation....
in your dreams. In most of the industrialised world evolution is the dominant explanation for life. Even in the USA the proportion rejecting evolution is remaining approximately static.
.... . Darwinism is just an atheistic scientific explanation that has man at the top of the food chain. That causes all sorts of moralistic problems. Look at SodomWood, a perfect example of man making the rules. As long as it is PC, anything goes.
Argument from your perception of adverse consequences is a feeble counter to the abundant scientific evidence that supports evolution. I know nothing of "SodomWood", but I assure you that just because one is an atheist it is false to say that "anything goes". The theory of evolution says absolutely nothing about who should or shouldn't be at the top of the food chain. If you think that the only thing stopping you from behaving badly is your Christian faith then I suggest that you notify your local police department of your flakiness, in case you have a crisis of faith.
You offered, "In most of the industrialised world evolution is the dominant explanation for life." Evolution is not the explanation for life ... and what a 'leap of faith' you exhibit by making such an assertion! Evolution is the explanation for how life develops, changes organismal groups, and deals with complexity through adaptation. If you want to address abiogenesis, well, that's a different notion altogether.