If he was a transient/just passing through, how would there be proof? This was ten years ago, who would remember? How many homeless people walk through cities that no one notices because they are part of the scenery?
I should have included the proof of DNA evidence as well. My bad. Right now this story may as well be a colander IMO.
the proof for me he did it is when his family can't give any evidence that he was with them on Christmas 96. So far they keep saying they have it, but how long does it take for them to find photos and the media to have them? This would have happend like yesterday. So IMO, if no photos show up, and there is no proof he was with his family at Christmas 96, than he is the guy! Waiting for the proof...
If he was a transient just passing through Boulder, these questions become even more difficult to answer:
_ How did he even know about the girl?_ How did he know the details of the Ramseys' personal life contained in the ransom note? The note, by the way, was written on paper from the Ramsey home.
_ How did he know where to find the girl's room in that rambling house?
_ How did he find the paint brush used to make the garrot? According to information published at the time and since, the paint brush came from inside the house.
_ How did he know to take the girl's body from the bedroom upstairs to that small room way down in the back of the basement?
Everything we in the public know about the case leads to the conclusion that someone connected to the family, not a total stranger, killed that child. If there is some prior connection between Karr and the Ramseys -- if, for example, he had done some work for them, or perhaps attended some of the beauty pagents JonBenet was in -- then he becomes a more plausible suspect.
He wasn't a transient, he wasn't homeless. At that time he had a house in Alabama, a wife, and three sons. Also other relatives. They are all going through their photos from Christmas 1996 to get proof that he was in Alabama when JBR was killed.