[commish]

This comment and what the media are reporting are garbage. I listened to the entire press conference. She made it clear that she CAN'T TALK YET ABOUT THE EVIDENCE BECAUSE OF COLORADO'S CODE. They could have 100% DNA evidence on this guy and at this stage can't talk about it.

Exactly. They can't hold this guy just for shits & giggles. The proof will come tomorrow or first thing next week -- if they arraign him and formally charge him with murder, we will know they have what they feel is solid eveidence. If they release him to the Petaluma, CA police without charging him, we will know he is just a nutjob blowing smoke OR that he knows who the killer is and got inside info from that person.

[CedarDave]

Can they require him to submit to a DNA test? He may refuse and just say why bother "I'm guilty".

[Perdogg]

There are people who despite the evidence will ALWAYS believe the Ramseys did it because of the following reasons:

1) They are rich,

2) The daughter was a kiddie beauty padget contestant,

3) The mother was less than media savvy.

[cherry]

I wouldn't count on dna....there was little dna IRRC...

however, if he was available to do the crime, which is apparently in question, and he knows certain details about the crime that have not been released, then he is good to go...

other theory is that he was in communication via the pedophile internet and exchanged "pleasantries" with other pedo's that are more directly connected to this case.....

I am thinking that Jon Benet's pictures were a hot item on the pedo network.....

[Protect the Bill of Rights]

Makes sense. (I like the comment 'shits and giggles'. Never heard that before.)

I caught the end of the presser. One question: She spoke of a sealed affidavit. If arraigned, will that automatically be unsealed or is it at the discretion of the judge?