Posted on 08/17/2006 9:28:21 AM PDT by Mr. Brightside
LOL RE #6!
Why is she still on the air, anyway?
I listened to every word.
Maybe he has a terminal disease and wanted to confess because he know he won't live to see conviction. Just a thought. (pure speculation)
Misinformation. The charge was child porn, and it was a California warrant. The Thais held him for extradition to the US, at which time he confessed.
Exactly. They can't hold this guy just for shits & giggles. The proof will come tomorrow or first thing next week -- if they arraign him and formally charge him with murder, we will know they have what they feel is solid eveidence. If they release him to the Petaluma, CA police without charging him, we will know he is just a nutjob blowing smoke OR that he knows who the killer is and got inside info from that person.
At the press conference they said that he tried to sign up for a job in a school district in Thailand just a few days ago. He hasn't been sitting in a prison in Thailand for any long length of time.
Once some on posts information/misinformation on a thread, it's repeated. Wonder how many FR readers don't follow the thread to conclusion and come away with the impression, he just wanted to get out of some Thai jail...
She still has to pay her plastic surgeon
Adding to my post #24. It still wouldn't mean he did it or not.
Then you obviously missed 90% of her comments
"Misinformation. The charge was child porn, and it was a California warrant."
Had not seen that just read the Thai authorities arrested him for a "sex crime". Thanks for the clarifications.
True..let's face it.. there are NO sex crimes in Thailand because practically everything is legal! This guy was staying in an area that was big in the sex trade and child prostitution.
Pun was *absolutely* intended.Perhaps I shouldn't have been so graphic,however.
Just about the only thing I'm inclined to believe of all the things he's said is that he was "in love" with the girl.
I have no doubt that he fell in love with her the moment he first saw a photo of her standing 3' 11",wearing a $300 wig and an inch of makeup.
I don't know, but it's kind of amazing how many people "know" stuff that isn't true. Kind of tells you how easy it is for the media and dems to spread a lie (like the "there were no WMDs in Iraq" lie) without anyone being able to correct it.
Can they require him to submit to a DNA test? He may refuse and just say why bother "I'm guilty".
Did you see his resume? I'd say whoever wrote it is no fruitcake, but a shrewd manipulator who knows exactly what he is doing.
I watched the press conference. She went out of her way to say that sometimes they have to arrest people before an investigation warrants it (implying that that is the case here). I should have said "in my opinion, it looks like they have no evidence."
Yup, and I can't count how many people have repeated ad nauseum that he has a good alibi. No, he doesn't. He still may not be the killer, and I have no problem saying that, but the two alibis given (and these are in print) by his ex-wife and brother don't match, so at the very least those two "witnesses" are unreliable. No doubt they'll change their story to one that matches, but to say that he has a good alibi just isn't true.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.