Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: darbymcgill

During the first televised hearing I made a comment about the billable hours sitting in the courtroom. I was 1/2 serious, 1/2 tongue-in-cheek.

I am sickened every time I hear "Let the jury decide" or "let the system do its work." Lis Weihl's (?sp) answer was telling one day. Someone mentioned the cost. She shrugged and said "that's the system we have." I was disgusted.

No Lis, that is not the way the system was set up.

These young men represent a small segment of our society in that their families can afford legal representation. More power to them. Of course, in the eyes of people like Barry Saunders, that is proof of guilt.

How many of us would lose everything we had if we found ourselves where those boys are. Worse, how many of us would feel pressured to make a plea just to end it?

This is why I cannot for the life of me understand the Nifong groupies who are so ignorant as to believe, truly believe, "If he didn't have a case, he would not be pushing this."


574 posted on 08/21/2006 11:16:39 AM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 570 | View Replies ]


To: Protect the Bill of Rights
How many of us would lose everything we had if we found ourselves where those boys are. Worse, how many of us would feel pressured to make a plea just to end it?

I think you've hit the nail on the head. It appears the NC system is rigged to string out the process to force the defendants to cop a plea...

Many people IMO think if you're arrested, you're probably guilty. And in most cases, that's probably true. But the system should be designed to protect the innocent, not railroad the guilty...

Just look at Elmostafa's "fare"... I wonder how many of her arrests where plea bargains... she pays a fee and moves out the revolving door...

577 posted on 08/21/2006 1:20:00 PM PDT by darbymcgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 574 | View Replies ]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

Ms. Weihl is wrong, but understandable. It is not our system that a prosecutor is allowed to abuse his office and bring charges against someone on no evidence for political purposes. Mr. Nifong may well find this out in civil and hopefully criminal court.

It is understandable that a former prosecutor would want the rest of us to believe that a prosecutor can do anything he wants and never be touched. That is something all of us nonprosecutors need to put a stop to.

And fortunately this case is not the rule. Usually the police see a criminal based on less evidence than the prosecutor. When the evidence to win the case is not their the prosecutor usually will not file. That other and ex-prosecutors refuse to publically denounce Nifong should make us all realize we need a check on them.


578 posted on 08/21/2006 1:21:48 PM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 574 | View Replies ]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

I remember when my older brother the lawyer was reading "The Man to See" which is about famous trial lawyer Edward Bennett Williams. My brother's favorite Williams quote was "Client's money is like toilet paper. When the roll runs out, go get another roll." Most lawyers share that attitude.


582 posted on 08/21/2006 3:50:12 PM PDT by Locomotive Breath (In the shuffling madness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 574 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson