The DA said that? My god, the guy is on tape saying he did it.
Text of Mary Lacy's meeting with press
http://www.denverpost.com/jonbenet/ci_4199137
"You all have many questions that you want answered. John Karr is presumed innocent. We are rightfully constrained by the code of professional conduct and the presumption of innocence from answering those questions that you want answered this morning."
On H&C they were discussing the JBR case. Can't remember exactly what was said, but thought that it was interesting that they were waiting for the DNA to determine if he was really the killer...that if the DNA didn't match they couldn't really proceed...well, I guess Durham can show them that you can, maybe you shouldn't, but you can. I just thought the comparisons of how they are talking about a case where someone has confessed, has a background of child pornography charges, is treated skeptically, but a case with no evidence was treated as the real deal....I will do as the DA in Boulder said, keep an open-mind, if they can prove that he couldn't have been in Boulder at the time it's over. Still wandering why someone would confess to something so gross if they didn't do it?