Deny that FReepers go to the ACLU? You made the assertion -- it is up to you to defend it. I appreciate your attempt to change the framework of the discussion, but it really is your job, forensically, to support your (now) assertion. I think you can get it raised to "contention" but it is not unreasonable to ask you to provide some links to prove your statement (which statement does, honestly, require "proof").
I don't know if I want to spend a lot of time getting links that you will either reject or marginalize. It is really not that big of a deal to me whether you accept it or not. Its there if you have followed the threads, thats all.
My friend, I merely ask you to substantiate statements you have made. This places you in the position of either substantiating them or admitting you cannot substantiate them. I invite you to do either. You don't have to spend a lot of time providing a lot of links. A representative handful will do.
Your friend
FD2003