Now, I could be wrong, but from this one image of Castro holding the newspaper, I think there is enough here to doubt the veracity of the photo, and if one photo is off, that means that ALL the photos have been publicized under false pretenses.
1 posted on
08/13/2006 12:14:24 PM PDT by
Pukin Dog
To: Pukin Dog
Generalissimo Francisco Castro is still dead.
2 posted on
08/13/2006 12:16:55 PM PDT by
thoughtomator
(Islam delenda est)
To: Pukin Dog
I screwed up one of the images. The second image should be this one:
3 posted on
08/13/2006 12:17:34 PM PDT by
Pukin Dog
(Sans Reproache)
To: Pukin Dog
I dunno. I've been using Photoshop for almost 10 years. I get your points, but I don't think there's enough here to call it a fake.
To be honest, his thumb interacting with the printed text makes it look real.
5 posted on
08/13/2006 12:20:28 PM PDT by
ElkGroveDan
(California bashers will be called out)
To: Pukin Dog
Did you use the sharpening filters... unsharp mask maybe? Those will give you those 'halo' effects I see.
7 posted on
08/13/2006 12:25:15 PM PDT by
johnny7
(“And what's Fonzie like? Come on Yolanda... what's Fonzie like?!”)
To: Pukin Dog
I agree with you and just said this on another thread. It is him from a healthier time and the newspaper has been photo shopped onto another newspaper also he has been placed into a photo of a bedroom. I don't have photoshop and I am just looking at the photo as it appears on FR.
12 posted on
08/13/2006 12:37:47 PM PDT by
Ditter
To: Pukin Dog
He's dead, Jim.
15 posted on
08/13/2006 12:44:30 PM PDT by
JRios1968
(That gal knows how to shake a possum...)
To: Pukin Dog
To: Pukin Dog
There is an easier way to tell the picture is fake:
I believe this picture was taken in 2002. I find it hard to believe he would be wearing the same jacket.
19 posted on
08/13/2006 7:54:27 PM PDT by
Michael.SF.
(If pro is the opposite of con, is progress the opposite of congress?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
