Recall Nifong - Vote Cheek (DukeLax Developments)

RecallNifong.com ^ | August 10, 2006 | Staff

[Hogeye13]

Agreed, but I believe it is at least two years and possibly longer. And the clock might not start until charges are dropped against the falsely accused.

Some of my thoughts on this could change considerably if Nifong takes this to trial and the players are acquitted. My original statements were based on the thought that the loss of support from the "black community" might influence Nifong to drop the charges. Her grievances might be decreased substantially if he can say that he tried but just didn't have the evidence. Then he can make the claim that he was not the cause of her "suffering".

[Protect the Bill of Rights]

he has nop reason to lie.

should be:

She has no reason to lie.

(couldn't leave it w/o a correction, must be my neurotic side)

[Mike Nifong]

This is from Neff's piece in the News & Observer based on the Discovery documents:

"At 1:22 a.m. March 14, Sgt. John Shelton of the Durham Police Department was called to the Kroger supermarket on Hillsborough Road. A scantily clad woman was passed out in a Honda Accord and wouldn't get out of the car. Shelton got no response when he talked loudly to her, his notes on the encounter say."

http://www.newsobserver.com/141/story/468272.html

[Mike Nifong]

Kirk Osborn's Motion File Nos. 06 CRS 4334-356, Dated the 7th of June, (Affidavit of Counsel for the Defendant in support of Motion to Suppress Non-Testimonial Photographs), states on the first page that officers were called to Kroger on Hillsborough Road on March 14, 2006 at 1:22 a.m.

1:22 a.m.

_

[don'tbedenied]

"Justification is not necessary for them to proceed with a civil suit. At this point it is all about M O N E Y. IMO."

With all due respect you are 100% wrong. Here's why:

1. The Duke 3 have no money. They have rich parents, not the same thing at all. They are judgment proof.

2. Civil cases allow detailed depositions, which have very low standards as to what can be asked. Precious cannot withstand day after day of testimony under oath.

3. There will be a civil case, the Duke 3 vs. Durham, federal civil rights case brought in federal Court by top, top civil lawyers--who will be paid attorney fees by Durham if they win any damages at all! (The Kennedy amendment to Section 1983).

$) From potential attorneys for Precious's point of view this case is a worse case scenario--up against the A-team of DC attorneys, funded by rich people, with a good chance of recovering all of their fees, the Duke 3's counsel will be filing as many motions and going to as many depositions as possible. And Precious attorneys certainly won't be paid by her, and they can't recover anything from college kids.

This isn't about a civil suit. She's got mental issues and drug issues, she's a pawn for Nifong.

[ltc8k6]

Yes, I know when the call came in from Kroger. Not disputing that.

Shelton's report bears the same case number and it begins with the call from 610.

So Sutton could not have responded at 1:22 regarding a rape, even if it took her an hour to get to the ER and the AV was in fact there by the time Sutton arrived.

If Sutton responded at 1:22 to a call, it wasn't about a rape.

[ltc8k6]

It's likely just a mistake, but I don't trust the DPD, so I'm suspicious.

[Mike Nifong]

ALERT ***_ ALERT *** _ ALERT *** _ ALERT ***

The charges have been changed against Elmostafa (Cabbie), he is now charged with aiding and abetting a 250 dollar theft.

I think this means that Nifong squeezed Hawkins (woman that plead guilty to the 3 year old 250 dollar theft) - and now she's changed her tune.

Elmostafa is getting royally screwed !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


_

[I want to know]

Here's an update on the cab driver's court appearance today.

http://dwb.newsobserver.com/news/ncwire_news/story/2992299p-9419145c.html

[Mike Nifong]

Cabbie charged with aiding

250 bucks versus Kim $ 25,000.00

[TommyDale]

Elmostafa has already paid more than that for his legal representation and loss of work for these ridiculous court appearances. Why wouldn't they just let the guy pay restitution, like they did Kim Roberts Pittman? Oh, she didn't pay it did she? LOL!

[abb]

Link to new thread...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1684229/posts

[Neverforget01]

This isn't about a civil suit. She's got mental issues and drug issues, she's a pawn for Nifong.

I think the AA community has caught on and the "money" will come from Durham--for Precious, if they can prove she was intimidated to continue the case--Nifong lied about condoms and strangling when he knew this to not be true. He bribed Kim Roberts. The Duke 3 will also win civil suits (BIG ones). Durham and Duke will pay through the nose.

[Dukie07]

Is this considered a lesser charge?

[SarahUSC]

I don't see a cause of action for the FA. She was used by a corrupt DA and Duke did nothing to stop it? What is Duke supposed to do? Duke has no control over the DA or DPD.

The FA started this entire thing by making false allegations. Who forced her to do that? No one.

[Mike Nifong]

YEs,

Aiding and abetting misdemeanor

instead of committing the misdemeanor

Yes, Lesser charge.

[Jezebelle]

It won't be thrown out is there's an immaterial error or even an unimportant material error.

That dog ain't gonna hunt.

[Dukie07]

Thanks Mike.

[Jezebelle]

As I suspected, the matter wasn't "continued" but rather a trial date was set. It may well get dismissed unless Nifong has a witness.

[Mike Nifong]

His witness was the woman that's already pled guilty.

She was arrested on July 7th.

She's in jail, but I'm sure she'll get favorable terms.

That's the way I read it anyway.