Posted on 08/11/2006 1:18:59 PM PDT by abb
Old and Cranky,
but what if you arrive (to the accident) and you're only backup?
Another officer responded first and is doing the paperwork.
That is a more analogous to what happeded here.
Peronally, I think she did her paperwork later - and went to Shelton for the times.
Don't Police dread paperwork. Put off what you don't like doing until the last minute?
Damned straight, I despise it. he has nop reason to lie.
I am more interested in what is in her report anyway.
Is it possible Nikki could have met up with Tammy and or Melissa before going to Kroger?
We had 2 police respond to the accident first one wrote what time she reported, 2nd wrote what time she reported, time of report remained the same. If this report said she was reporting to Krogers, I can almost see using the same time, but, supposedly the rape had not been reported at 1:22, so you would think that they would go with when the rape was reported. I don't know, maybe I'll ask my uncle about protcol. The whole case is so screwy.
Also the time is listed twice, I can see writing the 1:22 at top of report, but to say she responded at approx 1:22, oh so confusing...
Who was the judge in today's Elmostafa case (i.e., who postponed it again); and
who asked for the postponement (wasn't the state ready?)?
"Responded" and "arrived" are not the same thing.
Maybe they were on Central Standard Time? LOL!
Continued?
WTF?!?
When is the next court date? November after-the-electionth.
Most likely, because of liability, the city gets a SANE at the ready is the word "rape" is even mentioned. "Rape" is a buzz-word.
Shelton says nothing about 1:22 in his report. The first call would be Kim's from 610, imo. Shelton's report of the incident starts with Kim's call from 610.
"Continued" doesn't mean nothing happened. "Continued" can be an erroneous term for some other action. What was today's court date for?
I hope the cab driver has a good lawyer .
The Durham Police & Nifong act JUST LIKE the KGB .
True, but then when did she arrive? It would have had to take her more than an hour if Crystal's 2:30 arrival time at Duke ER is accurate.
I agree. My thoughts regarding these people is you never say never.
If she "responded" at 1:22, it was not in reference to a rape, regardless of when she finally arrived at Duke ER.
It doesn't and won't matter what time she arrived as long as it was contemporaneously reasonable to the "victim's" arrival at Duke. It's minor, and Nifong won't get much, if any, mileage out of it.
In general, no, but there is a statute running during which she has to file.
I agree. Moreover, won't the hospital records affix definite times of arrival and treatment? Also I cannot see throwing out information because one item was in error, especially given the paucity of information that contradicts or is inconsistent with what is in this report. All the evidence I have seen puts Nifong in a difficult situation. Impeaching his own police officers hardly strengthens his case.
I didn't write post #354, so how did your reply get connected to me? Just curious.
Anyway, the evolution of this supposed "rape" case began at 1:22 as far as the authorities first possible awareness of her complaint could have occurred, so perhaps that's why they use the 1:22 time. It would impact their liability. The point is that there can be explanations for her using that time that are built into the system that we are unaware of and, in any case, it isn't going to be a big issue in the scheme of things relating to guilt or innocence of the players.
I have seen this tactic used here in NC on many occasions. Some phony reason can be given by the DA to "continue" a case just to force a person to miss work, school or whatever as a way to beat them down to submission. This is a dirty tactic used by the system against working people here.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.