Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: MikeA

Actually, given the primitive nature of the katusha, how could they be certain that it is actually following a true ballistic trajectory that would be traceable back to a point of origin with enough precision to avoid collateral damage?


21 posted on 08/09/2006 4:12:07 PM PDT by MainFrame65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: MainFrame65

If a katyusha is a primitive rocket, it can't help but follow a ballistic path.

If you get 3 paintings, you can redraw the parabola. If you get more than 3, you can use a more complex trajectory that would compensate for spin.

Baseball players, if they are good batters, try to pick up the ball off the pitchers hand, then sample 2 or 3 more locations. If they can get 3 more, for a total of 4, they can compensate for the ball's spin. If they only get 2 more, for a total of 3, they swing as for a fastball.

Modern radars get hundreds of paintings, but for ballistic targets, they use them to correct error and ambiguity, rather than to get a more complex model.


22 posted on 08/09/2006 4:23:03 PM PDT by donmeaker (If the sky don't say "Surrender Dorothy" then my ex wife is out of town.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: MainFrame65

Upon triangulating the origin of fire, surround said town with artillery and send volleys until town is rubble. Search and mop-up, then onto next point of origin. It's what the Syrians did to defeat islamofascists. And it worked. Oh, and the media was not allowed in - had to rely on second hand information.


23 posted on 08/09/2006 4:25:04 PM PDT by gotribe (It's not a religion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson