Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pound Positive on Gatlin 'B' Sample (Worlds Fastest Man Banned for Life)
Sydney Morning Herald ^ | August 1, 2006

Posted on 07/31/2006 11:54:59 AM PDT by gopwinsin04

Pound positive on Gatlin B sample Email Print Normal font Large font August 1, 2006

Advertisement AdvertisementKINGSTON, Jamaica: Justin Gatlin was facing the prospect of a life ban after the World Anti-Doping Agency revealed his drugs test B sample had returned a positive, with WADA chairman Dick Pound calling for a harsh penalty if the results are confirmed.

Pound told BBC Radio that Gatlin's B test had backed up the A sample's positive for testosterone. "The B sample is positive, they've gone through that whole exercise," he said.

The International Association of Athletics Federation said Gatlin would be suspended for life if his positive A and B tests were confirmed officially.

However, Gatlin's coach, Trevor Graham, insisted on Sunday that the Olympic and world champion and co-world record-holder in the 100 metres was a victim of a set-up. "We are 100 per cent sure who it is," Graham said.

"The individual that did it, it's an individual that we fired and we went back and hired … he came to the Kansas relay and was [upset] with Justin." In The Washington Post, Graham claimed it was a masseuse with a grudge who rubbed a testosterone cream into Gatlin's legs, with Gatlin believing it was a harmless lotion.

On Saturday, Gatlin acknowledged he had been informed by the US Anti-Doping Agency he had tested positive for testosterone or other steroids after a relay race in Kansas in April.

The Gatlin revelation came just days after Tour de France champion Floyd Landis's victory was thrown into question for allegations of similar violations.

Landis was expecting to discover on Monday if his B sample had confirmed a positive drugs test for testosterone. If so, the American will be stripped of his victory and is likely to pick up a lengthy ban from the sport.

Gatlin said he did not know why his test came back positive. Gatlin's connection with Graham is viewed as problematic. Gatlin has positioned himself as a champion of drug-free competition while Graham is a key figure in the BALCO investigation and has coached several athletes who have tested positive for steroids.

If Gatlin is proven guilty, his world record would be stripped. He tied Jamaican Asafa Powell's mark of 9.77 seconds in the 100m in May, after the positive test.

Gatlin would also be banned for life, the standard discipline for a second positive test. Pound said: "He needs to be banned for up to life. There may be some extenuating circumstances to come out but I think if he just continues to come out with some bland denial that 'I never did anything, I can't imagine how this result occurred', that will not help him when it comes to sentencing."

On Monday, the IAAF urged governments to work closely with international federations to help rid sport of performance-enhancing drugs.

In a statement to Reuters, IAAF spokesman Nick Davies said: "We need to find ways to work even more closely with governments to destroy the criminal elements that are behind doping in sport.

"Sports sanctions alone do not seem to be sufficient deterrent, especially not for the support staff behind the athletes who are profiting from doping but cannot be affected sufficiently by sports sanctions. These people are criminals and only the full force of the law will stop them."

Reuters, AP


TOPICS: Sports
KEYWORDS: gatlin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 07/31/2006 11:55:01 AM PDT by gopwinsin04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: gopwinsin04

Any indication what sport this may be?


2 posted on 07/31/2006 11:57:34 AM PDT by Toby06 (True conservatives vote based on their values, not for parties.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gopwinsin04

"Trevor Graham, insisted on Sunday that the Olympic and world champion and co-world record-holder in the 100 metres was a victim of a set-up. "We are 100 per cent sure who it is," Graham said."

Uh huh. Obviously, with his unsullied and blemish free reputation, we should believe him /sarc.

Funny how these people always have some kind of reason why they are innocent and not in fact cheats...


3 posted on 07/31/2006 11:58:39 AM PDT by Canard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

WADA chairman Dick Pound
4 posted on 07/31/2006 11:58:50 AM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Toby06

5 posted on 07/31/2006 11:59:58 AM PDT by gopwinsin04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Toby06

Running, I think. Track and field. The gentleman holds the world record in 100-meters.


6 posted on 07/31/2006 12:00:01 PM PDT by Tax-chick (I've always wanted to be 40 ... and it's as good as I anticipated!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Toby06

"Any indication what sport this may be?"

Yes, reading the article would give an indication!


7 posted on 07/31/2006 12:00:24 PM PDT by Canard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Toby06

track and field


8 posted on 07/31/2006 12:00:25 PM PDT by midnightcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Canard

Maurice Greene set him up!


9 posted on 07/31/2006 12:00:43 PM PDT by gopwinsin04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Canard
Graham claimed it was a masseuse with a grudge who rubbed a testosterone cream into Gatlin's legs, with Gatlin believing it was a harmless lotion.

Very creative!

10 posted on 07/31/2006 12:00:59 PM PDT by Tax-chick (I've always wanted to be 40 ... and it's as good as I anticipated!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

How come the rest of us don't get to use excuses like this? I wasn't intentionally drink driving, a barman with a grudge rubbed vodka into my legs....


11 posted on 07/31/2006 12:03:20 PM PDT by Canard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Canard

OK, smartass, what paragraph & line.


12 posted on 07/31/2006 12:12:18 PM PDT by Toby06 (True conservatives vote based on their values, not for parties.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: gopwinsin04

I could infer that, but it doesn not state that anywhere in the article I saw. a 100m race could easily be a swimming race, but 9.7 seconds would be a little fast.


13 posted on 07/31/2006 12:15:22 PM PDT by Toby06 (True conservatives vote based on their values, not for parties.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Toby06

"The International Association of Athletics Federation............Olympic and world champion and co-world record-holder in the 100 metres" pretty much narrows it down, I would have thought.


14 posted on 07/31/2006 12:23:19 PM PDT by Canard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: gopwinsin04

just for the record I think Landis is clean.


15 posted on 07/31/2006 12:47:17 PM PDT by Echo Talon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Canard

Hmmm, could be swimming, ya know. Yep, narrows it, does not ever define it. Thank you for confirming my point.


16 posted on 07/31/2006 12:56:35 PM PDT by Toby06 (True conservatives vote based on their values, not for parties.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Toby06

One would have thought that, had it been swimming, the comment from the International Association of Athletics Federation would have been "why the hell are you ringing us?" :)


17 posted on 07/31/2006 1:09:56 PM PDT by Canard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Toby06

Paragraph 5 line 1...


18 posted on 07/31/2006 1:13:50 PM PDT by Publius6961 (overwhelming force behaving underwhelmingly is a waste.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Canard
How come the rest of us don't get to use excuses like this? I wasn't intentionally drink driving, a barman with a grudge rubbed vodka into my legs....

Well, in all fairness that's not a fair comparison.
Alcohol is not absorbed into the system enough to make a difference in a test for alcohol, which is at a very high level (comparitively speaking).

Two things are at play here. Since the sixties, instrumentation for measuring levels of just about any substance have become ridiculously sensitive, and the level of certain substances may be set absurdly low for banning. Ways of introducing those low levels are so trivial it could happen to anyone... Just eating out at the wrong place will do it. Or contaminating snack food.

Having said that, I think he's guilty; lying under those circumstances is a given.

However, being "set up" is a real and almost unavoidable possibility.

19 posted on 07/31/2006 1:20:23 PM PDT by Publius6961 (overwhelming force behaving underwhelmingly is a waste.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961

"However, being "set up" is a real and almost unavoidable possibility."

This is true. However, in a hypothetical situation where one had been set up, having both a previous positive test for banned substances and a coach with relationships with several banned drugs cheats would not be particularly helpful with regard to convincing anyone of ones innocence.


20 posted on 07/31/2006 1:25:39 PM PDT by Canard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson