Obscene and gross:

Not obscene or gross...

It's about the same amount of boob. It's a crazy world, friends... a crazy world.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
To: tuffydoodle
2 posted on
07/29/2006 8:32:20 AM PDT by
HairOfTheDog
(Head On. Apply directly to the forehead!)
To: HairOfTheDog
"I was SHOCKED to see a giant breast on the cover of your magazine"I am shocked whenever I don't see a giant breast on the cover of a magazine.
3 posted on
07/29/2006 8:33:26 AM PDT by
Lazamataz
(Islam is a perversion of faith, a lie against human spirit, an obscenity shouted in the face of G_d)
To: HairOfTheDog
It's called "baby talk" -- but how is the baby in that picture going to be able to utter anything?
4 posted on
07/29/2006 8:34:16 AM PDT by
BenLurkin
("The entire remedy is with the people." - W. H. Harrison)
To: HairOfTheDog
I don't think it is gross at all.
My sister breast fed my niece at my graduation (she had a towel to cover herself). I saw a woman breast fed her kid on the metro.
5 posted on
07/29/2006 8:34:54 AM PDT by
Perdogg
To: HairOfTheDog
6 posted on
07/29/2006 8:35:01 AM PDT by
Alberta's Child
(Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
To: HairOfTheDog
LOL
This same argument was going on 20-30 years ago when I was nursing my kids. And 20 years before that!
Everything old is new again. ;-)
I liked the woman who didn't want her husband or son to have to see a breast that they didn't 'want' to see. I guess she's content for them to stick to online porn... lol
Pinz
7 posted on
07/29/2006 8:36:31 AM PDT by
pinz-n-needlez
(Jack Bauer wears Tony Snow pajamas)
To: HairOfTheDog
Maybe it's really an elbow and not a breast.
10 posted on
07/29/2006 8:37:48 AM PDT by
jdm
To: HairOfTheDog
I'm not sure what the two pictures have to do with each other.
I find the baby picture beautiful, but in my home, not on a magazine cover.
13 posted on
07/29/2006 8:38:55 AM PDT by
Vision
(“I press on toward the goal to win the prize for which God has called me" Philippians 3:14)
To: HairOfTheDog
Reminds me of that joke, what do breasts and toy trains have in common? They were both made for kids, but the fathers always want to play with them.
15 posted on
07/29/2006 8:39:48 AM PDT by
dfwgator
To: HairOfTheDog
"I'm totally supportive of it - I just don't like the flashing," she says. "I don't want my son or husband to accidentally see a breast they didn't want to see." It isn't flashing to breast feed a baby. Also, she isn't worried about here son and husband seeing a "breast they didn't want to see", she is worried about them seeing a breast SHE doesn't want them to see.
18 posted on
07/29/2006 8:40:45 AM PDT by
calex59
(The '86 amnesty put us in the toilet, now the senate wants to flush it!)
To: HairOfTheDog
"I shredded it," said Gayle Ash, of Belton, Texas, in a telephone interview. "A breast is a breast - it's a sexual thing. He didn't need to see that." What an incredibly immature view of the world. How did this woman ever manage to get pregnant in the first place - by lying back and thinking of the Alamo? ;)
Besides that picture doesn't even look like a breast - it could just as easily be a (small) part of Ted Kennedy's belly.
22 posted on
07/29/2006 8:43:29 AM PDT by
Mr. Jeeves
("When the government is invasive, the people are wanting." -- Tao Te Ching)
To: HairOfTheDog
even as breast-feeding itself gains more support from the government and medical community.You have to be lib to the bone to even write this sentence. Who cares what the "government" thinks about breast feeding?
24 posted on
07/29/2006 8:45:06 AM PDT by
lawnguy
(Give me some of your tots!!!)
To: HairOfTheDog
That's a pretty innocent picture, and an adorable baby. How well I remember that expression on a baby's face at just the same point in the proceedings.
People really are odd and puritanical if they can get upset over this. There is absolutely no need for anyone, male or female, to see anything at all when one is breastfeeding in public. It can be done with such perfect discretion that no flesh shows at all. People who mind a fully-clad woman with a ten-pound bulge in her arms have got a problem.
25 posted on
07/29/2006 8:45:46 AM PDT by
Fairview
To: HairOfTheDog
Only a really creepy pervert would think that a nursing baby is "sexual".
26 posted on
07/29/2006 8:46:01 AM PDT by
kcmt01
To: HairOfTheDog
So...
functioning, natural breasts are obscene
and
Non-lactating or silicone-filled breasts are "natural"?
???
OY...oy...OY!!!
32 posted on
07/29/2006 8:49:26 AM PDT by
bannie
(HILLARY: Not all perversions are sexual.)
To: HairOfTheDog
"I shredded it," said Gayle Ash, of Belton, Texas, in a telephone interview. "A breast is a breast - it's a sexual thing. He didn't need to see that."Grow up, ayle Ash, of Belton, Texas.
34 posted on
07/29/2006 8:50:25 AM PDT by
TankerKC
(¿José puede usted ver?)
To: HairOfTheDog
You're right, there's nothing wrong with the cover pic. Looks fine. Looks like they've got some interesting stories in there too... "quickie routines that work!"
:o)
35 posted on
07/29/2006 8:52:20 AM PDT by
spunkets
(Just kidding)
To: HairOfTheDog
It's a crazy world, friends... a crazy world.I agree. I don't think it's a very attractive picture of the baby or the boob "-), but it's not showing anything that's not on dozens of other general-circulation magazine covers.
39 posted on
07/29/2006 8:57:05 AM PDT by
Tax-chick
(I've always wanted to be 40 ... and it's as good as I anticipated!)
To: HairOfTheDog
Another mother, Kelly Wheatley, wrote Babytalk to applaud
the cover, precisely because, she says, it helps educate
people that breasts are more than sex objects. And yet
Wheatley, 40, who's still nursing her 3-year-old daughter,
rarely breast-feeds in public, partly because it's more
comfortable in the car, and partly because her husband is
uncomfortable with other men seeing her breast.
hypocrites!
hiding in cars, disgusting public restrooms or in the dark
shadows of stairwells in malls to feed an infant is ridiculous!
41 posted on
07/29/2006 8:59:22 AM PDT by
leda
(Life is always what you make it!)
To: HairOfTheDog
It's a crazy world when people get upset over
a travel mags depiction of Le Grand Tetons on the cover.
46 posted on
07/29/2006 9:08:42 AM PDT by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson