Skip to comments.
Many Outraged by Breast-Feeding Magazine Cover
AOL News ^
| 07/27/06 18:23 EDT
| By JOCELYN NOVECK, AP
Posted on 07/29/2006 8:31:37 AM PDT by HairOfTheDog
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 next last
Obscene and gross:
![](http://cdn.news.aol.com/aolnews_photos/04/07/20060728154909990017)
Not obscene or gross...
![](http://www.hispanicsurf.com/images/elsa_benitez.jpg)
It's about the same amount of boob. It's a crazy world, friends... a crazy world.
To: tuffydoodle
2
posted on
07/29/2006 8:32:20 AM PDT
by
HairOfTheDog
(Head On. Apply directly to the forehead!)
To: HairOfTheDog
"I was SHOCKED to see a giant breast on the cover of your magazine"I am shocked whenever I don't see a giant breast on the cover of a magazine.
3
posted on
07/29/2006 8:33:26 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(Islam is a perversion of faith, a lie against human spirit, an obscenity shouted in the face of G_d)
To: HairOfTheDog
It's called "baby talk" -- but how is the baby in that picture going to be able to utter anything?
4
posted on
07/29/2006 8:34:16 AM PDT
by
BenLurkin
("The entire remedy is with the people." - W. H. Harrison)
To: HairOfTheDog
I don't think it is gross at all.
My sister breast fed my niece at my graduation (she had a towel to cover herself). I saw a woman breast fed her kid on the metro.
5
posted on
07/29/2006 8:34:54 AM PDT
by
Perdogg
To: HairOfTheDog
6
posted on
07/29/2006 8:35:01 AM PDT
by
Alberta's Child
(Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
To: HairOfTheDog
LOL
This same argument was going on 20-30 years ago when I was nursing my kids. And 20 years before that!
Everything old is new again. ;-)
I liked the woman who didn't want her husband or son to have to see a breast that they didn't 'want' to see. I guess she's content for them to stick to online porn... lol
Pinz
7
posted on
07/29/2006 8:36:31 AM PDT
by
pinz-n-needlez
(Jack Bauer wears Tony Snow pajamas)
To: Perdogg
I don't think it is gross at all. Healthy people don't, IMHO :~) The artificial nature of modern life has made us a little uptight and confused.
8
posted on
07/29/2006 8:36:37 AM PDT
by
HairOfTheDog
(Head On. Apply directly to the forehead!)
To: Perdogg
I was seated in the waiting area of a busy restaurant last night, when a young mom sat down threw a blanket up over her shoulder and prepared to nurse her baby girl. I just smiled and looked away. Why do so many make such a big deal about the method God created for women to feed their young? I think it is sinful to object and make an issue of it.
9
posted on
07/29/2006 8:36:58 AM PDT
by
tioga
To: HairOfTheDog
Maybe it's really an elbow and not a breast.
10
posted on
07/29/2006 8:37:48 AM PDT
by
jdm
To: Alberta's Child
Now those are ugly obscene boobs for sure!!
11
posted on
07/29/2006 8:38:02 AM PDT
by
tioga
To: Alberta's Child
Looks like he's due any day now, but his kid will be taught to suck on the government teat! ;-)
Exhibit A: Patches
Pinz
12
posted on
07/29/2006 8:38:07 AM PDT
by
pinz-n-needlez
(Jack Bauer wears Tony Snow pajamas)
To: HairOfTheDog
I'm not sure what the two pictures have to do with each other.
I find the baby picture beautiful, but in my home, not on a magazine cover.
13
posted on
07/29/2006 8:38:55 AM PDT
by
Vision
(“I press on toward the goal to win the prize for which God has called me" Philippians 3:14)
To: Alberta's Child
The most disgusting thing about this picture of Teddy is the third breast he's growing under his armpit.
![](http://www.photopile.com/photos/dead/auctions/166757.jpg)
Have to be a pretty desperate baby to feed off that.
14
posted on
07/29/2006 8:39:15 AM PDT
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: HairOfTheDog
Reminds me of that joke, what do breasts and toy trains have in common? They were both made for kids, but the fathers always want to play with them.
15
posted on
07/29/2006 8:39:48 AM PDT
by
dfwgator
To: Lazamataz
I am shocked whenever I don't see a giant breast on the cover of a magazine.It probably means you've got your neighbor's Newsweek and they've got your Jugs. :~)
16
posted on
07/29/2006 8:40:31 AM PDT
by
HairOfTheDog
(Head On. Apply directly to the forehead!)
To: pinz-n-needlez
"I'm totally supportive of it - I just don't like the flashing," she says.
Flashing? LOL. I have never seen a woman flashing (opening and closing her top suggestively, repeatedly) while breastfeeding. The person making that comment comes across as hysterical.
17
posted on
07/29/2006 8:40:42 AM PDT
by
jdm
To: HairOfTheDog
"I'm totally supportive of it - I just don't like the flashing," she says. "I don't want my son or husband to accidentally see a breast they didn't want to see." It isn't flashing to breast feed a baby. Also, she isn't worried about here son and husband seeing a "breast they didn't want to see", she is worried about them seeing a breast SHE doesn't want them to see.
18
posted on
07/29/2006 8:40:45 AM PDT
by
calex59
(The '86 amnesty put us in the toilet, now the senate wants to flush it!)
To: dfwgator
That's funny.... My dad's really into trains :~)
19
posted on
07/29/2006 8:41:06 AM PDT
by
HairOfTheDog
(Head On. Apply directly to the forehead!)
To: calex59
Besides it's not flashing, it's a "wardrobe malfunction."
20
posted on
07/29/2006 8:42:40 AM PDT
by
dfwgator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson