"No I'm not. It has a direct bearing. You are trying to justify your belief that evolution is inherently anti-christian in nature and to do that you reject the possibility of Christians accepting both Christ and Evolution"
You must not be capable of reading. I myself accept evolution, you fail to specify which type, you fail to regonize that some Christians are idiots and break the "norm". You are foolishly trying to have me state the wrong ideology that the two cannot go hand in hand together, and you foolishly fail to recognize that they cannot go hand in hand together because of flawed moral dillemmas.
"You seem conflicted. On one hand, at least in this post, you agree that belief in Evolution does not alter the state of belief for a Christian, yet, on the other hand, you claim that common sense dictates a contradiction in accepting both Evolution and Christianity."
Again, you fail to recognize what I had written. I think this is because you fail to understand what it means to be a Christian. Catch up on basic religious knowledge, then get back to me.
"OK. What does make you a Christian?"
Hello? I posted this prior. "Belief in Jesus Christ as one's Lord and Savior{.
Therefore there is no conflict between Christianity and TToE. And as I stated, the Church He founded is on board.
There is no difference between micro and macro evolution. Macro evolution is nothing but accumulated micro evolutionary changes. This is articulated quite clearly in the SToE.
What 'norm' are these 'idiot' Christians breaking?
"You are foolishly trying to have me state the wrong ideology that the two cannot go hand in hand together, and you foolishly fail to recognize that they cannot go hand in hand together because of flawed moral dillemmas.
So, the 'wrong' ideology is that the two cannot go hand in hand? Why then do you follow up by stating that they cannot go hand in hand? Are you admitting that you adhere to the 'wrong' ideology?
Your idea that there is a logical contradiction between Evolution and religion is based on a poor understanding of the SToE. Evolution needs a preexisting species to create a new species. It does not suggest that a new species originates from nothing. It says nothing about the origin of life.
"Again, you fail to recognize what I had written. I think this is because you fail to understand what it means to be a Christian. Catch up on basic religious knowledge, then get back to me."
I can only go on what I read. If you insist on equivocating your terms I can only surmise you are having trouble getting your thoughts straight.
I come from a long line of creationists. My father married into a whole family of re-born Christians. I have a fair idea of what it means to be a Christian.