"You seem to believe that Christians are defined as Christian by not believing Evolution."
I do not know where you found me makin such claim, because this would be incorrect.
"You state in a post that you are an IDist. I hope you are aware that most IDists say they believe an alien race could be the designer. How does that fit in with your definition of IDist?"
In the least IDists integrate an intelligent force. They do not decline Evolution, but they do not decline an Intellient force. Evolution makes no such claim to protect Christianity, but defines life through various natural or random causes. Evolution has not implemented a protective layer for religion. (The generic Evolution theories that I have seen, or been forced to read in my educational process.)
What about this article or thread made you decide to move it to chat?
post 118 "Evolution's core argument is that life was created from raw natural process. This is against the Christian philosophy that life was generated from a Superior Being."
Here you create a sharp division between Evolution and Christianity.
post 142: "A more accurate statistic would be Protestant Christian pastors who support evolution, but not ID or Creationism."
In this post you develop two groups, those that are protestant Christians and all others.
post 182: "You can call yourself "Christian" because you have a family that may have attended a Church once, as many people do, but this does not imply those statistics are Christian."
When taken in context of your previous posts, this casts doubts on the Christian status of those that support Evolution.
"Evolution has not implemented a protective layer for religion. "
Why should it?