post 118 "Evolution's core argument is that life was created from raw natural process. This is against the Christian philosophy that life was generated from a Superior Being."
Here you create a sharp division between Evolution and Christianity.
post 142: "A more accurate statistic would be Protestant Christian pastors who support evolution, but not ID or Creationism."
In this post you develop two groups, those that are protestant Christians and all others.
post 182: "You can call yourself "Christian" because you have a family that may have attended a Church once, as many people do, but this does not imply those statistics are Christian."
When taken in context of your previous posts, this casts doubts on the Christian status of those that support Evolution.
"Evolution has not implemented a protective layer for religion. "
Why should it?
"You seem to believe that Christians are defined as Christian by not believing Evolution."
>
Now you are moving to a different subject, and I think you are intentionally doing such for the sake of jumping around and making this more confusing. Believing in Evolution, does NOT make you or unmake you a Christian -- as belief in Christ as one's Lord and Saviour DOES. However, Evolution makes no stance to protect Christians, in the sense that ID, or Creationism does. The Bible states that God created all-things. Evolution states nature did such. Common sense would assume an issue here.
>
In response to your other misguided quotes, you are taking the broad term Christianity out of the context of the situation of MY response.
> Saying you are Christian does NOT make you Christian.
> There are various TYPES of Christian denominations. Often-times you have to be specific. There are Liberal communities (as evolutionist claim, and use, to support their cause), there are Conservative communities (who are heavily anti-evolution). These communities differ in beliefs according to their interpretation of the Bible. Supposed conservative evolutionists here fail to recognize this.
>
'Evolution has not implemented a protective layer for religion.'
"Why should it?"
Because of the reasons aforementioned, and because it is easier to justify many of the Left's arguments through such means.