Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Restorer
For instance, Darwin himself carefully avoided any attempt to explain how life came into being, as opposed to the differention of species in existing life forms. However, Darwinists today try to explain not only the emergence of life from non-living matter, but some even try to use the theory to deny the possibility of God being involved in the creation of the Universe.

Wile it is true that a few scientists opine in this fashion and many dishonest creationists claim that the above is actually a part of the theory of evolution, the theory itself makes no such statements on either subject.

Nazis are much more Darwinist insofar as they view the issue as one of survival of the fittest race, with little or no morality involved.

"Fitness" in the context of evolution is relative to environment with no absolute standard.
14 posted on 07/23/2006 9:18:41 AM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Dimensio
"Fitness" in the context of evolution is relative to environment with no absolute standard.

Absolutely. If eventually only Aryans survived, because they had killed everybody else, Aryans would by definition be the most fit.

21 posted on 07/23/2006 9:31:48 AM PDT by Restorer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Dimensio
For instance, Darwin himself carefully avoided any attempt to explain how life came into being, as opposed to the differention of species in existing life forms. However, Darwinists today try to explain not only the emergence of life from non-living matter, but some even try to use the theory to deny the possibility of God being involved in the creation of the Universe.

------------------- Wile it is true that a few scientists opine in this fashion and many dishonest creationists claim that the above is actually a part of the theory of evolution, the theory itself makes no such statements on either subject.

Dimensio if main stream scientists does accepts that evolution does not "explain how life came into being"... what area of science it is looking in to what that non-evolution life creating means is and if so does it continue to operate in parallel to evolution

(it would be illogical to assume that if there was a non-evolution life creation it would happen only once and only once,,, this would seen to open the possibility to several non-evolution created species)...

49 posted on 07/23/2006 10:13:04 AM PDT by tophat9000 (If it was illegal French Canadians would La Raza back them? Racist back their race over country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson