Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Dimensio
For instance, Darwin himself carefully avoided any attempt to explain how life came into being, as opposed to the differention of species in existing life forms. However, Darwinists today try to explain not only the emergence of life from non-living matter, but some even try to use the theory to deny the possibility of God being involved in the creation of the Universe.

------------------- Wile it is true that a few scientists opine in this fashion and many dishonest creationists claim that the above is actually a part of the theory of evolution, the theory itself makes no such statements on either subject.

Dimensio if main stream scientists does accepts that evolution does not "explain how life came into being"... what area of science it is looking in to what that non-evolution life creating means is and if so does it continue to operate in parallel to evolution

(it would be illogical to assume that if there was a non-evolution life creation it would happen only once and only once,,, this would seen to open the possibility to several non-evolution created species)...

49 posted on 07/23/2006 10:13:04 AM PDT by tophat9000 (If it was illegal French Canadians would La Raza back them? Racist back their race over country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: tophat9000
Dimensio if main stream scientists does accepts that evolution does not "explain how life came into being"... what area of science it is looking in to what that non-evolution life creating means

The study of abiogenesis is handled by biologists.

is and if so does it continue to operate in parallel to evolution

Do you mean the study of the subject or the process itself?
57 posted on 07/23/2006 10:35:48 AM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: tophat9000
"Dimensio if main stream scientists does accepts that evolution does not "explain how life came into being"... what area of science it is looking in to what that non-evolution life creating means is and if so does it continue to operate in parallel to evolution"

Abiogenesis, which is primarily made up of biochemists. It is thought that the original pre/proto-life were subject to Evolutionary mechanisms but that hasn't been verified.

The mechanisms of the SToE have been well studied, tested and verified to work with life. It is unknown to what degree it works with pre-life.

69 posted on 07/23/2006 11:11:47 AM PDT by b_sharp (Why bother with a tagline? Even they eventually wear out! (Second Law of Taglines))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson