Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Jezebelle
She's (Coldwater) a leftwing psycho. Try posting on CTV's political forum. You'll see.

I've never had the pleasure. But I have no doubt that you're right. Some of her justifications for locking threads and pulling posts leave little doubt about her politics.

530 posted on 07/22/2006 6:58:15 AM PDT by Mad-Margaret
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 494 | View Replies ]


To: Mad-Margaret; Jezebelle
She's (Coldwater) a leftwing psycho.

I believe that "Coldwater" is a signon used by whomever CourtTV has moderating various boards. Thus whomever they have "throwing coldwater on when the discussion gets too hot" is known on each board as "coldwater." My reason for this is that moderating seems to vary at different times which to me implies either a split personality or multiple personalities behind the signon.

And yes CourtTV is terribly biased left. That is why I would rather post and discuss here, especially since the supporters of Mangum have nothing to contribute on the CourtTV board anyway. It is one thing when there are two sides to a case to discuss. In this one, you either believe/hope for a conviction based on a racists jury's nullifaction or you look at the evidence and see no case. Other cases the issue is not so cut and dried.
534 posted on 07/22/2006 8:10:21 AM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 530 | View Replies ]

To: Mad-Margaret; Jezebelle
She's (Coldwater) a leftwing psycho.

I believe that "Coldwater" is a signon used by whomever CourtTV has moderating various boards. Thus whomever they have "throwing coldwater on when the discussion gets too hot" is known on each board as "coldwater." My reason for this is that moderating seems to vary at different times which to me implies either a split personality or multiple personalities behind the signon.

And yes CourtTV is terribly biased left. That is why I would rather post and discuss here, especially since the supporters of Mangum have nothing to contribute on the CourtTV board anyway. It is one thing when there are two sides to a case to discuss. In this one, you either believe/hope for a conviction based on a racists jury's nullifaction or you look at the evidence and see no case. Other cases the issue is not so cut and dried.
535 posted on 07/22/2006 8:10:23 AM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 530 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson