Posted on 07/19/2006 7:08:36 AM PDT by Merta
OK, how come Liberals are against outsourcing yet for Illegal Immigration to take the jobs Americans won't do, yet are against ANWR even if the Unions want to drill there.
How come Hollywood actors and actresses wear gowns that cost milliona and millions of dollars for one day, yet complain about Conservatives and charity?
How come Liberals wear Che T-shirts, yet no Conservative wears an Augusto Pinochet T-shirt?
How come Liberals even support somewhat a policy system that has led to the worst environmental, mass murder, dissent crushing and working records yet pledge to stand behind it?
How come Liberals say that they are for the working class yet want the death tax, eminent domain, and side with Environmental regulation in low income housing?
How come Liberals complain about the glass ceiling, yet postulate a circular economy(meaning that Liberals raise taxes to make the rich poor, and the poor rich hoping that the public, in 20 years, is too dumb enough that last week's poor is this week's rich and doing everything to reverse the cycle) to control the people who rise above?
How come Democrats trust the most in people who play a real zero-sum game with people's tax dollars(AKA politicians) yet decry the whole economy as zero-sum?
How can Socialists yell "fascist" at the opposition when both definitions of that system link themselves to real fascism, and fascism was practiced in Communism with Stalin before Hitler was in power?
How come Liberals don't like war, unless it is a class struggle, how can they say that they see things in grey when they are so black and white on different people?
Why did I hear that a quaker school of kids publicy vouched to assassinate Ronald Reagan, when he was the most peaceful president out of the previous administrations except for Eisenhower?
How come Liberals don't like war, unless Bill Clinton is president?
How come Liberals want to help people, but when it comes time to force the hand to pay, their only solution is to the UN, without it they are Neo-Isolationists?
Why do a few people in Venezuela like Chavez until he proclaimed himself President for life, and now hate him? Shouldn't they have accepted that when the influential Socialist already got into power?
Why do people in Baltimore, who have been within years of "progressive" rule and getting worse and worse, still elect the same ole Democrats to "help" them?
Why do people vote for a party that has had some of the biggest Democrats(Irish in Boston) be huge racists, have the city Boston where a hockeyplayer, who was black, was ridiculed with the N-word, has the KKK, David Duke, Stormfront and Fred Phelps all marching in opposition to the Iraq War, and then claim that they are tolerant, especially when they say that opponents of Homosexual marriage are homophobic but being against Israel in an extreme way isn't being Anti-semitic?
How come Liberals finally realize the large evangelist wing in the GOP, when that wing has been there since the beginning as being the biggest Anti-Slavery wing?
Why can't Liberals understand the strong connections between Abraham Lincoln, and President Bush? Why must their descendants be loyalists, copperheads, draft dodgers and all kinds of people shirking from the right thing?
Why do Liberals use victimhood, no responsibility, blame everything on President Bush, run a bloated government, than complain about education, while at the same time wanting taxes increased on things like gas, and believe that the Feds can only do anything, deny faith-based funding, and consider freedom of religion, while yelling about government inefficiency, calling us tight, than yelling about the deficit we are spending on Iraq, where the goalposts are moved from no WMDs to they weren't ready enough, when they might as well say that there is no such thing as a legal war, especially if Bush is President and they come up with all kinds of theories including that Ken Lay, who had no connection to Bush in terms of being a "wise dissedent" was killed because he knew too much though they hate him and yet believe that they are a good, bright, fresh agenda?
Why they maybe wouldn't mind legalizing heroin, but cigarettes are bad for you
Why Liberals insist that they are for Civil Rights, to including victimology to blacks, and giving poor people of all colors cocaine laced with welfare money and not care.
Why Liberals believe that Bush is a terrorist, believe that global warming is more of a threat than terrorism, chide Bush for not reacting to 9/11 earlier, than saying the people deserved it and castigating Bush for what happened?
Why Liberals don't see the irony, that their side has committed more terrorist acts than the right, that they see terrorists as sort of outlaws, and want rights for criminals, see racists under every rock, yet say that Bush sees terrorists under every rock, and that there should be no fear.
Nobody has answered why Bush would be such a dictator if he is. Why he would silence, and do everything he can, if the NYT knows everything and doesn't even give a motive. I mean, I am sure that they have a tape, where Bush calls Muslims fools, and blames the whole world on muslims.
That somehow, a library search, probably already routine for police, is a violation of our civil rights, yet you have the same people saying that issuing the most outrageous ideas on this Administration and getting free.
That nobody could give an example where Ted Kennedy, Randi Rhodes or someone was wiretapped and dealt with in a Clinton or Nixon fashion
That Liberals would be for the working class, and consider themselves patriotic yet use the sneer "flag-waving dorks" and call the same class a bunch of backwards hicks.
That Liberals would be for advancement in minorities, yet diversity in thought(for even a small amount of people) is to be handled with in iron fist fashion.
That Liberals support the troops but consider Bush, Hitler, and call him a leader of an empire, not only that but 78% of them voted for Bush.
that Liberals would say that 2000 and 2004 were cheated, that Bush should've compromised, yet as history has shown compromise allowed the South to stay racist.
Here is one from a friend: That the riots for blacks were in the North, yet peaceful protests and peaceful advancement was done in the South.
OK, I am done.
This is not a vanity thread like the other one, but I really want to address my political opinions in a rhetorical way. I hope that you enjoy it.
Why?Liberals are "held" to a different standard.Thank the msm and the so called liberal/cultural elite.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.