Replies

I posted this at stalag CW as well.

http://www.wral.com/slideshow/news/8856916/detail.html?qs=;s=5;w=764

Note the account of the attack used in the Finnerty search warrant. It was written on 4/18, so it is a later version of events.

Note how it doesn't mention that the dancers went into the bathroom after the broomstick remark. It has them leaving the house together for the car after the broomstick remark.

A huge difference.

It's really odd because it blows a hole in the idea that the AV was incapacitated after the dance by a drug. In this version, the AV just goes out to the car with Nikki after they quit dancing.

Note also that this version references Kim's statement, yet it is at odds with Kim's statement.

I posted this at stalag CW as well.

Yeah, I saw that and it is a good catch. In an ordinary case one would think that the evidence the prosecution at a later date in an affidavit application would be the story they would present at trial. In this case who knows.