Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Call adds mystery to lacrosse case (DukeLax)
News and Observer ^ | July 12, 2006 | Joseph Neff

Posted on 07/12/2006 1:52:14 AM PDT by abb

Phone use spans time of team party

In the middle of a Duke lacrosse party where a dancer said she was gang-raped for 30 minutes, a call was placed from her cell phone to a Durham escort service.

The 12:26 a.m. call to the service, Centerfold, lasted one minute, according to a copy of her cell phone bill reviewed by The News & Observer. It is unclear whether the call was a request for another job, a cry for help or something else, or even whether the accuser made the call herself.

But the accuser's phone records add some details to the chronology of the March 13 party, a drunken spring break bash that spawned a national controversy.

Neither prosecutors nor defense lawyers would discuss the phone records Tuesday. Neither the accuser nor a second dancer at the party could be reached, nor could representatives of Centerfold. Police Chief Steve Chalmers was out of town; his spokeswoman said he would not discuss the case.

Three players have been charged with first-degree rape, sexual offense and kidnapping: Reade Seligmann, 20, of Essex Fells, N.J.; Collin Finnerty, 19, of Garden City, N.Y.; and Dave Evans, 23, of Bethesda, Md. Lawyers for the players have proclaimed their clients' innocence and said no rape or sex occurred at the house at 610 N. Buchanan Blvd.

District Attorney Mike Nifong, whose handling of the case has undergone national scrutiny, has been adamant that the woman was raped at the party. Nifong has not given a precise timeline of when he thinks an assault occurred.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsobserver.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: duke; dukelax; durham; lacrosse; nifong
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 721-730 next last
To: Mad-Margaret

Stephens finally ruled that the records could be released at one of the hearings. I saw it on TV. Copies of the records went to the DA and the defense at that time.


41 posted on 07/12/2006 6:43:18 AM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: All

For reference:

http://johnsville.blogspot.com/2006/04/duke-lacrosse-rape-timeline.html

Duke Lacrosse Rape Timeline


42 posted on 07/12/2006 6:44:28 AM PDT by maggief (and the dessert cart rolls on ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: maggief

43 posted on 07/12/2006 6:47:01 AM PDT by maggief (and the dessert cart rolls on ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: ltc8k6

Yep! But there wasn't a definite date for the release. IIRC the Nifong crowd was still doing something with the cell phone. And any release of the records would only be to the defense -- not to the public.

Does this mean that the records HAVE been released to the defense? And if N&O got Crystal's cell phone records from the defense, why didn't it identify the source?


44 posted on 07/12/2006 6:50:58 AM PDT by Mad-Margaret
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: maggief

I just realized that you can tell that Reade is still wearing the same shirt he had on at the party.


45 posted on 07/12/2006 6:51:26 AM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Excellent timeline that helps organize the essential facts around the alleged incident.


46 posted on 07/12/2006 6:52:11 AM PDT by bjc (Check the data!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: All

The 12:26 call was probably an attempt to get a ride. The night was over earlier than expected and she had no way to get home.


47 posted on 07/12/2006 6:52:53 AM PDT by SarahUSC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: abb

This is the best. Absolutely OUTSTANDING. I hope Joan won't mind me reposting with attribution...



joan foster [Visitor]

07/11/06 at 20:43
An ode to Miss Melanie

You'll write about probation
And public urination
You'll write about the neighbors they annoyed.
You'll headline the way they swagger..
hose priveleged spoiled DUKE braggarts
But, yikes, you can't take on the DURHAM boys.

You covered Baker in his glory
He swore there was just ONE story
The city council crowned him with complete acclaim!
Now court docs show several versions..
But the N&O can't cast aspersions!
You certainly can't ask him to explain!

Nifong went on TV a-gloating,
Talking condoms, drugs and choking
Now it seems..perhaps the facts don't fit.
You couldn't ignore what looked like fibbing
(or perhaps political ad-libbing?)
But after one little story, better let it slip.

Kim called the tale a "crock"
Gottlieb has writers block
The taxi driver gets the full court press.
The line-ups are sure no-losers
Only LAX-ers for the choosers
But, still the Editor has nothing to address?!!!

Are the accuser's friends in jail?
Do you approve of Kimmy's deal?
Who composted that POSTER plastered about town?
Miss Melanie just shrugs...
And avoids the nasty blogs
She thinks silence will shut our questions down.

But, NO! We exist in isolation.
We thrive on deprivation.
Miss Melanie, we sremain here till the day
Either you or SOME news service
Buckle up..this rowdy bunch stands COMMITTED to the fray.


48 posted on 07/12/2006 6:55:02 AM PDT by Locomotive Breath (In the shuffling madness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SarahUSC

Yep, she is outside at 12:26 for sure, imo. She couldn't get back in to make more money, she was mad at Kim, and she needed a ride. She made that call from the back porch.

She could not get a ride, I'll bet.

Frustrated, she goes into her catatonic act....


49 posted on 07/12/2006 6:55:23 AM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale
Organized crime? Government officials involved?

And then there's drugs. You don't think...gasp...that the police are somehow involved in drug trafficking do you?

50 posted on 07/12/2006 6:57:00 AM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: abb

Of course as Nifong SAID IN OPEN COURT, he could not imagine what evidentuary value Magum's cell phone could have.


51 posted on 07/12/2006 6:57:51 AM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ltc8k6
In addition to all the facts that suggest the Duke players did not rape the AV, the additional timeline information suggests that applying Occam's Razor we have to conclude that the AV is lying. In other words the litany of assumptions you would have to make to support the AV's allegation is mind numbing.

From Wikipedia: Occam's razor states that the explanation of any phenomenon should make as few assumptions as possible, eliminating those that make no difference in the observable predictions of the explanatory hypothesis or theory.

52 posted on 07/12/2006 7:05:37 AM PDT by bjc (Check the data!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: abb; xoxoxox

Thanks for the ping, abb

Is this a service not named before?

---
xoxoxox
Thought you might be interested in this.
Centerfold Escort Service.


53 posted on 07/12/2006 7:06:09 AM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad-Margaret; All

**Related story**NOT Duke LAX**

(Not interested? Please disregard.)

http://www.fresnobee.com/local/story/12440058p-13161613c.html


Teen tied to sex case safe in city near coast
Girl returns to Fresno; she may have witnessed the alleged gang rape.

By Tim Eberly / The Fresno Bee

(Updated Wednesday, July 12, 2006, 4:24 AM)

EXCERPT

Tuesday afternoon, Davis and Scott, both former Reedley College football players from Florida, were formally charged with one count each of a lewd act upon a child. If found guilty, they could serve as many as eight years in prison.

The criminal complaint reveals little about the case, saying Davis and Scott had "substantial" sexual contact with her.

The suspects were initially arrested by police on charges of child molestation and oral copulation. A spokesman for the Fresno County District Attorney's Office, Bob Ellis, said the lewd act charge covers the same ground.

"You could charge both, but they cover the same conduct," Ellis said. "And the punishment is the same."


54 posted on 07/12/2006 7:07:17 AM PDT by maggief (and the dessert cart rolls on ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

Centerfold. 2000 Bivins St Durham, NC zip code. Phone: (919) 490-8444 ...


55 posted on 07/12/2006 7:07:37 AM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

National franchise? Mafia?


56 posted on 07/12/2006 7:08:00 AM PDT by TommyDale (Stop the Nifongery!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

More:
184296
PIN 0815-04-50-6877

Account No. 8293169

Tax District CNTY-DRHM/FD-LEBANON

Land Use Code 111
Land Use Desc RES/ 1-FAMILY

Subdiv Code 2361
Subdiv Desc GREYMOSS SEC 2
Neighborhood 054RJ
------
Since this is residential I would assume the owner (or tenant) is the Centerfold contact.


57 posted on 07/12/2006 7:10:58 AM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

Angel/Angels
Bunny Hole
Allure
Platinum

Add: Centerfold


58 posted on 07/12/2006 7:15:14 AM PDT by maggief (and the dessert cart rolls on ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

2000 Bivins St. must be a small office park ...

http://www.whitepages.com/10001/search/ReverseAddress?housenumber=2000&street=Bivins+St&city_zip=27707&state_id=


59 posted on 07/12/2006 7:16:30 AM PDT by maggief (and the dessert cart rolls on ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: maggief

The owner of this property (I won't put the name up because we are not sure if he is the landlord or owner) seems to have come from Ohio. He also has address in Carrbaro County and Chapel Hill.
No criminal record that I can find
Centerfold is not listed in teh Dept of Corp website (surprise....not)


60 posted on 07/12/2006 7:20:32 AM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 721-730 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson