Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: 4butnomorethan30characters

I'm a metallurgist, but have never worked with it & am not a 'DU expert' by any stretch. A friend of mine did his post-doc with DU and knows it fairly well.

It is somewhat similar to lead in its properties (easily cast), and is more 'toxic' than lead. Wouldn't want it in ground water sources for instance.

It is not radio-active in the sense that these kooks make it out to be. The radium (glow-in-the-dark) on watch hands is far more 'radio active' than DU ammo.

DU is desireable for ammo, because it undergoes 'adiabatic shear' at high strain-rates. In other words, when it is deformed very quickly (shot from a gun) it becomes progressively sharper, and continues to shear itself into a sharp point during penetration.

Other metals 'behave as liquids' at high strain rates, i.e. bullets 'mushroom' and have limited penetration because of it.


35 posted on 07/06/2006 3:51:00 PM PDT by proud_yank (Truth to liberals is as useful as a snowblower in hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: proud_yank

Also--what about Am in smoke detectors...8^)


44 posted on 07/06/2006 5:39:35 PM PDT by rzeznikj at stout (ASCII and ye shall receive... (Computers 3:14))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson